Classic joke, something like: if you owe the bank $100, it’s your problem; if you owe them a million, it’s their problem.
Comment on Report: Potential NYT lawsuit could force OpenAI to wipe ChatGPT and start over
DavyJones@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 year ago
When OpenAI commits copyright infringement no one bats an eye, but when I do it everyone downvotes me
troyunrau@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 year ago
Only on lemmy.world
spiderman@ani.social 1 year ago
Society moment.
DrM@feddit.de 1 year ago
Yeah I don’t get it. ChatGPT is not “Fair use” and there is no credit given to anyone, it’s a solid case against them
makyo@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I just wonder if they’ll get out of it because LLMs do reword the information instead of spitting it back out verbatim. It’s the same reason I think the image generators are safe from copyright law - it’s just different enough that they could plausibly convince a judge with a fair use argument.
What bothers me even more is all the text they had to scrape to create ChatGPT… That seems like a novel problem for the legal system because you know there’s no way they paid for all of it.
DrM@feddit.de 1 year ago
It doesn’t matter. For it to be fair use under American law they would need to give full credit, which they obviously don’t.
FiskFisk33@startrek.website 1 year ago
I’m not 100% sure where I stand but, for arguments sake; Are you sure about that? it sure is transformative!