Comment on Reddit will lock some content behind a paywall this year, CEO says

• 2pt_perversion@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  [deleted]

  source

  • Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Yeah but there is a FOSS nature about it. At least ANYONE can do whatever they want with the comments and posts I make public instead of just whichever company pays reddit for API access.

    I mean… True; it’s just I wouldn’t characterize Lemmy as superior on privacy. Ideally we’d figure out a way to fix that, but I’m not sure we can really.

    And reddit has some legal jargon about co-owning the copyright to whatever you post over there but lemmy doesn’t so you technically have more protection here to your own intellectual property.

    This I’m not so sure about. You aren’t handing over ownership rights when you sign up for most (any?) instance, but your ownership right is effectively null and void.

    IANAL but arguably in a US court (at least) since Lemmy is effectively a true public place, you effectively lose the right to tell other people what they can do with your interactions.

    And privacy is a whole different can of worms as I don’t think ruud is harvesting telemetry to sell to advertisers and whatnot.

    That part is arguably true. It is harder to tie this data back to a particular user for the purposes of selling to advertisers.

    source

    • 2pt_perversion@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      [deleted]

      source

      • Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        The law is largely down to who argues better in court. There is precedent for reduced rights in public spaces. e.g. if you go into the town square and talk to someone and it’s caught on the camera of the mother a park bench away that’s recording her child … that’s not an illegal recording and she has the copyright on said recording. You have no legal right to ask the mother to delete the recording or delete your audio from the recording, even in a two party consent space because you have no right to privacy in a public setting like that.

        Similarly, when you post on Lemmy … it’s kind of good faith that if you delete something it actually gets deleted from the platform across all instances and that it’s not just visibility deleted but deleted from the databases under the hood.

        You do “own your content” but it’s pretty meaningless ownership.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • Dil@is.hardlywork.ing ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      At least yall dont literally legally own my whole ass identity while im on lemmy

      source
• TORFdot0@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  At least Lemmy is open source and there isn’t any advanced analytics running and telling server operators exactly what you look at and for how long. And if there was, it would be discovered quickly and you could host your own instance and only look at content locally.

  Your posts aren’t private. But that’s the whole point so that they can be seen and federated

  source

  • Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    No it wouldn’t. People need to understand that open source provides 0 security against intentional abuses when there’s a networking layer involved.

    I could be running an analysis on the data your instance handed to my instance just like Reddit is … and you would have absolutely no way of knowing.

    source
• Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  A public forum (be it old school message boards, Reddit or Lemmy) is by definition not private. It’s more about the policies of a given platform; whether you do allow algorithmic content targeting and other schemes to “drive engagement”.

  source

  • Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Yeah, I think the big selling point for me is not the privacy on Lemmy, but control of conversation.

    source