Comment on [deleted]
designated_fridge@lemmy.world 1 week ago
If you’re not putting your money into index funds you’re just fooling yourselves. You shouldn’t be paying any form of investor to pretend they can see into the future.
This also means you will be investing heavily in the US. But don’t make the mistake of believing your invested money makes any difference in the world when it comes to ethical responsibility. A company isn’t affected by whether a fund invests or does not invest in them.
Socially responsible funds are just for show because financial institutions have realised it’s something people will pay for. If you truly want to make the world a better place you reduce your monthly saving amount and donate the money to charities instead.
Tehdastehdas@lemmy.world 1 week ago
True, usually index funds outperform active investors, but there are special cases (third point below):
cnbc.com/…/heres-when-active-mutual-funds-tend-to…
False. When you buy existing shares, they’ll see the increased demand and issue more shares, making more money from investors after you. Same as when you buy a stolen item, the thief reacts to increased demand by stealing another one.
Those “responsible” ESG-labeled funds (Environmental, Social And Governance) are too lax for modern investors’ thirst for good. We need tighter criteria. Someone here said tailored ethical funds exist: lemmy.world/comment/15070231
Good, but unsustainable. You can grow power by growing money in benefit corporations, such as Mozilla.