How does it compare to OsmAnd?
Comment on Google officially changes the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America on Maps
_lilith@lemmy.world 1 week ago
What a great time to download Organic maps
ouch@lemmy.world 1 week ago
gedaliyah@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Also a great choice. I prefer organic maps for a variety of reasons (like ability to contribute to the maps), but a lot of people prefer OsmAnd. They are both very good.
superkret@feddit.org 1 week ago
Organic Maps has fewer features and settings and concentrates on what most people use the most.
It is also much, much faster than OsmAnd.oxf@sh.itjust.works 1 week ago
OsmAnd is the Swiss army knife of Open Street Map frontends, but as I’m sure you’ll agree on (if you’ve used it), it can be a bit of a headache setting it up, as well as getting familiar with it.
Organic Maps caters more to people seeking a pure alternative to Google/Apple Maps. It’s the layman’s alternative.
If you’re a poweruser, and already familiar with OsmAnd, there’s no point in switching. But in terms of getting other, non tech savvy, people to switch, it’s a great recommendation!
Junkernaught@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 week ago
I love that it’s not google, and the UI is nice, but the lack of realtime traffic info is a real blocker for me
gedaliyah@lemmy.world 1 week ago
You might be interested in Magic Earth is is also built on OpenStreetMap but includes crowdsourced traffic data. If you are in a big city then it’s likely they have good data for your area.
Sunshine@lemmy.ca 1 week ago
It’s a massive upgrade in terms of aesthetics and privacy!