Comment on Virtualizing my router - any experience to share? Pos/cons?
GameGod@lemmy.ca 18 hours agoThat is pretty sweet. I have a second server I could use for an HA configuration of the router VM. I’ve been meaning to play around with live migrations (KVM) so this could be a cool use case for testing.
ikidd@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
It works well. I have my docker hosts on HA as well because they’re almost as important as the router.
If you just use 2 nodes, you will need a q-device to make quorum if you have one of the nodes down. I have the tiebreaker running on my Proxmox Backup Server shitbox I3.
Proxmox is basically just debian with KVM and a better virt-manager. And it deals with ZFS natively so you can build zpools, which is pretty much necessary if you want snapshotting and replication, which are necessary for HA.
GameGod@lemmy.ca 17 hours ago
I could just use VRRP / keepalived instead, no?
I should try Proxmox, thanks for the suggestion. I set up ZFS recently on my NAS and I regret not learning it earlier. I can see how the snapshotting would make managing VMs easier!
ikidd@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
Proxmox uses a voting system to keep cluster integrity.
Check it out, it’s free and does a lot of things out of the box that take a lot of manual work otherwise. And the backup server is stellar. It does take a while to wrap your head around the whole way it does things, but it’s really powerful if you spend the time to deep dive it.
Oisteink@feddit.nl 17 hours ago
So 3+ hosts for clustering or 2 hosts and an qdevice to fake it