Comment on Study of 8k Posts Suggests 40+% of Facebook Posts are AI-Generated

• Petter1@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  I see no problem if the poster gives the info, that the source is AI. This automatically devalues the content of the post/comment and should trigger the reaction that this information is to be taken with a grain of salt and it needs to factchecked in order to improve likelihood that that what was written is fact.

  An AI output is most of the time a good indicator about what the truth is, and can give new talking points to a discussion. But it is of course not a “killer-argument”.

  source

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    The context is bad though.

    The post I’’ referencing is removed, but there was a tiny “from gemini” footnote in the bottom that most upvoters clearly missed, and the whole thing is presented like a quote from a news article and taken as fact by OP in their own commentary.

    And the larger point I’m making is this pour soul had no idea Gemini is basically an improv actor compelled to continue whatever it writes, not a research agent.

    My sister, ridiculously smart and more put together, didn’t either. She just searched for factual stuff from the Gemini app and assumed it’s directly searching the internet.

    AI is a good thinker, analyzer, spitballer, initial source and stuff yes, but it’s being marketed like an oracle and that is going to screw the world up.

    source

    • Petter1@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      I agree 😇

      source

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

        👍

        source