Comment on [deleted]

FundMECFS@slrpnk.net ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

• Teknevra@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  No, i wrote it.

  source

  • FundMECFS@slrpnk.net ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    My bad then. I very much associate bolded bullet points with LLMs. :)

    source
  • Telorand@reddthat.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Sounds like something an AI would say… /j

    source

    • Teknevra@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Damn, you caught me

      /s

      source

      • FundMECFS@slrpnk.net ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Tbh tho some of the sentences sound soooo AI generated:

        This playful nod to the concept of social credit in China and other countries could serve as an ironic commentary on surveillance and governance, resonating with users familiar with global critiques of social credit systems.

        A unique name like “Social Credit Score” could enhance brand identity, making the platform stand out in digital discussions.

        Adopting “Social Credit Score” instead of “Karma” could add depth and humor to user interactions, reflecting Lemmy’s political leanings while encouraging critical conversations.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • spujb@lemmy.cafe ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    no hate but i don’t believe you. i came to the comments to say exactly what @FundMECFS@slrpnk.net said. returns 70% ai on quillbot.com along with my own personal experience that no human uses “resonating” “add depth” “playful nod” “spark discussions” as much as I have seen ChatGPT use those phrases. other patterns include stringing together nouns in ways that sound smart but don’t add value, eg “surveillance and governance” “social justice… and global inequality”

    …it’s okay to use ai? but no need to lie about it. goodness knows the internet is already too full of people lying about ai produced content, don’t join them lol

    source