Foxnews.com is nothing like Fox News on cable. In the same vein, cnn.com is nothing like CNN on cable.
The .com version of both is far more sane, far less partisan. But both are partisan! In other words, the TV version of both is for easily influenced idiots.
But you already knew this, right? You’ve compared coverage of events over the years on all 4 platforms? No, you didn’t. You thought you’d throw a quicky “burn” in there, feel good about it.
Hahahahaha neither the fuck did you. You think you did but you just consumed the content. If you did I demand the research now and it better be fuckin cited properly. 4 years of it.
Amoxtli@thelemmy.club 1 month ago
The article says Texas paid for it. Reading is fundamental.
WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I don’t read or care for entertainment sites.
Lovstuhagen@hilariouschaos.com 1 month ago
What has been helpful to me is to ignore the idea that there even is an “objective” position to be sought.
Nothing is objective.
Read both right wing and left wing sources - that is the best way to stay informed.
shalafi@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Foxnews.com is nothing like Fox News on cable. In the same vein, cnn.com is nothing like CNN on cable.
The .com version of both is far more sane, far less partisan. But both are partisan! In other words, the TV version of both is for easily influenced idiots.
But you already knew this, right? You’ve compared coverage of events over the years on all 4 platforms? No, you didn’t. You thought you’d throw a quicky “burn” in there, feel good about it.
Doom@ttrpg.network 1 month ago
Hahahahaha neither the fuck did you. You think you did but you just consumed the content. If you did I demand the research now and it better be fuckin cited properly. 4 years of it.