Unboxious@ani.social 3 days ago
Kinda disappointed by how relatively normal and restrained the cinematography was this week tbh. Also kinda weird that the shopkeeper didn’t come up with the solution Ruche presented earlier, since it was such a blindingly obvious idea.
pelya@lemmy.world 2 days ago It’s a deliberate cinematography technique - you make your characters dumber, so when they discover an obvious solution to the plot, it’s described like a genius move.
Amd yeah, I would expect the moment of flexing on the old Ruche’s party to produce some gmod-grade facial expressions, but eh, they were quite restrained.
It’s a deliberate cinematography technique
I guess you could call it that. I’d usually say “lazy writing technique”.
headward_scissorfeet@lemmy.zip 2 days ago
I guess in a way it wasn’t obvious because Ruche had to sacrifice her share for the trade to work and Elm was still stuck thinking he was working with 20% of the haul because he is still laboring under the assumption that his 20 80 split is the deal he has agreed to.
This works out fine for Ruche because now Elm owes her big, and he has no hope of abandoning her. Probably the hag worked out this strange relationship as well, so Elm got played good by the two women.
Unboxious@ani.social 1 day ago
We knew that, and Elm knew that, but there’s no reason to assume the shopkeeper knew that.
headward_scissorfeet@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
My baseline assumption is that Ruche is figuring things out a bit later than Elm, so if she arrives at a given solution, particularly an obvious solution, Elm probably thought of it and then rejected that solution for some reason. Even supposing that this is not the case, Elm still rejects this solution and argues completely valid reasons for rejecting her solution.
As far as the shopkeeper is concerned, Elm is just another party leader trying to drive a hard bargain to maximize the party’s gold and her suspicion about Elm is that he is taking advantage of Ruche. The crone mentions this early on in their conversation and doesn’t believe Elm when he says it’s not like that.
When Ruche makes her suggestion and Elm refuses despite having wanted that skillbook, she revises her opinion of Elm and Ruche because it is then obvious that Elm is not bargaining in a way that is self-serving or even optimal. Her internal monologue stops short of saying this despite making basic observations and obvious deductions, but withholding the less obvious deductions is a something this show has been doing throughout its run.
I suppose it’s possible that someone might have to rewatch the episode. Or perhaps just rewatching the scene with these three characters might be necessary. Personally I find it funny that the audience is forced to imagine the mental state of these characters right at the point where we no longer have the benefit of hearing their internal monologues.