Maybe just use percentages instead of these weird units. 0.2 MHh per hour is just 0.2 MW, or 20%.
Comment on Solar modules now selling for less than €0.06/W in Europe
alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 21 hours agoA MW of solar averages out to about .2 MW/h per hour. A MW of nuclear averages about .9 MW/h per hour.
But even so as the UK does it, nuclear power isn’t worth it. France and China are better examples since they both picked a few designs and mass produced them.
xthexder@l.sw0.com 16 hours ago
486@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
MW/h
There is MW which is a unit of power and then there is MWh which is a unit of energy, but what is MW/h supposed to mean?
alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 21 hours ago
Thanks for catching the typo.
MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 21 hours ago
Nuclear actually around 0.5 or 0.6, because 1/3 is always off for repair and control.
alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 21 hours ago
Maybe in the UK when each plants is basically unique instead of having improvements from all the previous iterations. In the US it’s around 92%. I don’t know how to search China or France’s numbers, but I suspect they’re similar or better.
oyo@lemm.ee 2 hours ago
In many regions solar capacity factor is much higher than 20%; for example, the entire US. atb.nrel.gov/electricity/2021/utility-scale_pv