Comment on This is a simple and satisfying way to fight Trump and Musk | It's time to delete X
Buffalox@lemmy.world 16 hours agoHe/She doesn’t understand anything, he/she doesn’t know me.
If the comment was along the lines of: I understand IF you are hurt and angry, it would be completely different and not presumptuous.
But thanks for pointing out a possibly poorly worded good intention.
As he wrote it, it looks like an ad hominem, because it looks like he accuses me of being emotional and irrational in my argument, which I think I argued based on reason, even though some here disagree in my point.
I hope you can at least agree that it was poorly worded.
TootGuitar@sh.itjust.works 15 hours ago
You don’t just get to call any words that you don’t like, or even words directly attacking you, an ad hominem. A statement is only an ad hominem if 1) it’s attempting to refute an argument 2) by attacking the character/motive of the person making the argument INSTEAD OF the actual content of the argument. “Your argument is wrong because you’re an idiot” is an ad hominem. What the other commenter said to you is not. Note that people claiming “ad hominem” on statements that are not are sometimes said to be committing an “ad hominem fallacy fallacy.”
laurencetennant.com/bonds/adhominem.html
Buffalox@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
Which is EXACTLY what he did.
TootGuitar@sh.itjust.works 5 hours ago
Ok buddy, you only quoted part of what I said. You’re wrong, accept it and move on.
Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 hours ago
I took the part that was essential. Your claim that only things like this is an ad hominem is essentially the same argument.
That’s the same as your argument is wrong, because you are angry and hurt, and therefore not rational. Both are equally as much attacks on the person and not the argument.