Comment on 3D printing a house
kalpol@lemmy.ca 1 week agoYou are correct. I watched one being built. It is only the walls, for one thing, they still did foundation, roof, interior framing the old-fashioned way. The concrete was trucked in on pallets and mixed on site and it looked like a ton of work, and the machine was always breaking, it looked like.
Honestly don’t know why they don’t print the concrete forms in plastic and inject concrete, injectable cast concrete has been a thing for like a hundred years. You could do your raceways and plumbing runs and all then fill.
That would be a lot of waste plastic. Concrete is very heavy. That means the form hast to be extremely tough. For plastic that means a lot of plastic. At a certain point you won’t win anything there either.
isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 week ago
I wouldn’t think so. This may be one of the few cases where recycling plastic is actually practical. Recycling plastic is normally a big problem because it’s a very dirty supply stream. Plastic products often have multiple types of plastic laminated together, often include plastic labeling, etc. Even if you make a plastic consumer good out of a reusable thermoplastic, recycling is still impractical. Plus the main contaminants - food remains, react chemically at the temperatures necessary to remelt the plastic.
But this? You would be printing out huge slabs of solid plastic. Imagine big blocks and slabs of plastic 3"-12" thick. They could be made entirely of a single type of plastic. You use a thermoplastic, one that can be melted and reused repeatedly. Make them with no dyes and a chemistry optimized for maximum recyclability.
The printer prints out big plastic forms. Then the forms are injection-filled with concrete. Workers then pry or chip off the plastic forms and collect the debris for recycling. At the recycling plant, the pieces are given a basic cleaning, but the contaminants are almost entirely bits of concrete. Plastic melts at a temperature far far below the melting or decomposition point of any of concrete’s components. Concrete dust can simply be filtered out from the stream of molten plastic.
And that is a lot of plastic on one job. But because of that, builders would actually be incentivized to recycle it. You’re talking potentially thousands of dollars worth of plastic sitting there.
This wouldn’t be a practical replacement for regular rectangular concrete formwork. If you just want straight vertical walls and floors, since you have to tear-down the dorms afterwards, this isn’t going to be competitive with regular formwork. But what if you want to live in a curvy house? What if you want a more flowing space with continuously varying arches, curves, and vaults? This kind of almost organic home form is not within the budget of the average person. The forms required are just too complex. For this type of organic modern architecture, I could see 3D printing plastic forms being a practical option.
You’re right, it would require a lot of plastic. But existing concrete forms also require a lot of material. We’re just able to reuse the forms many times.
Problem is that plastics do not recycle too well. Every time you melt plastic it degrades. That means you always need new plastic and some gets lost. If you want to use recycled plastic you have to add virgin plastic every time. Also printing such thick plastic will take a long time. I don’t think it scales. If you want concrete forms, then generic preforms made from wood are way more practical.
isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 week ago
Eh, some can be recycled up to ten times. And it’s not like you can use plywood forms infinitely either. Those break down after 10-20 uses as well on average. And, just like plastic, every time you reuse plywood molds some of the material gets lost. Some gets damaged when prying the forms off. Plywood sheets get cut down to the shape of the next job. Etc.
And again, I’m imagining this primarily where plywood forms are not practical without very skilled and intricate work. Imagine a home built like this. The cost would be completely impractical for normal residential budgets. But printed forms and injected concrete? Maybe.
Image
Image
xav@programming.dev 1 week ago
You think about it the wrong way. Do it progressively : 3d print the thin plastic form 10cm high, then pour the concrete, let it dry, print 10 more cm, pour again … That way you need very few plastic.
walden@wetshav.ing 1 week ago
That would take a very long time.
xav@programming.dev 5 days ago
Indeed
kalpol@lemmy.ca 1 week ago
That’s kinda my point. It’s really a materials and structure engineering problem. How do you automate house-building? Maybe you don’t need concrete at all, or only in strategic places.
isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 week ago
Exactly. Automated house building could take many forms. It could be a big 3D concrete printer on a gantry crane. It could be a crew of humanoid robots using ordinary human power tools. It could be a robot arm on a powered dolly that lifts and nails, glues, or welds panels and beams into place.