Comment on JetKVM - a polished take at the nanoKVM(?)
xia@lemmy.sdf.org 2 weeks ago
We really need to get past the 1080p barrier. AFAICS there is one economical KVM solution for that, and several costly enterprise kits. Surely the actual hardware cost/difference per-unit would only be quite small now?
486@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Why? Even 1080p is more than what is usually needed for such a KVM solution. It is not like this is meant for doing remote work on a computer or anything like that.
xia@lemmy.sdf.org 2 weeks ago
Because sometimes I would rather things be slow than blurry, and my workstation monitor is >1080p.
Schmeckinger@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
You aren’t supposed to do serious work over these things. They should be a last resort imo.