Comment on JetKVM - a polished take at the nanoKVM(?)
xia@lemmy.sdf.org 11 months ago
We really need to get past the 1080p barrier. AFAICS there is one economical KVM solution for that, and several costly enterprise kits. Surely the actual hardware cost/difference per-unit would only be quite small now?
486@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Why? Even 1080p is more than what is usually needed for such a KVM solution. It is not like this is meant for doing remote work on a computer or anything like that.
xia@lemmy.sdf.org 11 months ago
Because sometimes I would rather things be slow than blurry, and my workstation monitor is >1080p.
Schmeckinger@lemmy.world 11 months ago
You aren’t supposed to do serious work over these things. They should be a last resort imo.