Comment on I present: Managarr - A TUI and CLI to help you manage your Servarr instances

• Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  But that implies you do have your SSH open to the world, right?

  The way I access my private web interfaces remotely is through something like Netmaker, Tailscale or Zerotier. Same thing for SSH. No way in hell am I opening 22 on my router.

  source

  • Revan343@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    You can use any port for ssh. When I switched from 22 to 1337, brute force attempts at logging in stopped

    source

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Obscurity is not the same thing as security.

      source
  • ShortN0te@lemmy.ml ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Netmaker, Tailscale or Zerotier

    No way in hell i am giving a company complete remote access to my servers and clients.

    source

    • DesolateMood@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      All these companies do is make it easier to use wireguard, if you’re so afraid of them just use wireguard yourself, you’ll get the same effect

      source

      • ShortN0te@lemmy.ml ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        This is not really correct. Those companies take complete control of the secret keys. And no, it is not the same effect when you use tailscale compared to wireguard cause of various reasons. CGNAT, no port forwarding, funnels etc.

        source
    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      You know those can be self hosted, right?

      And yes, but all means just set up your own Wireguard or OpenVPN access if that’s what you prefer. You do you bud.

      source