Comment on Linus Torvalds reckons AI is ‘90% marketing and 10% reality’
Mikelius@lemmy.world 2 weeks agoFor sure, it seems like 90% of ai startups are nothing more than front end wrappers for a gpt instance.
Comment on Linus Torvalds reckons AI is ‘90% marketing and 10% reality’
Mikelius@lemmy.world 2 weeks agoFor sure, it seems like 90% of ai startups are nothing more than front end wrappers for a gpt instance.
dan@upvote.au 2 weeks ago
They’re all built on top of OpenAI which is very unprofitable at the moment. Feels like the whole industry is built on a shaky foundation.
I guess the successful AI startups will eventually transition to self-hosted models like Llama, if they survive that long.
Zos_Kia@lemmynsfw.com 2 weeks ago
Most projects I’ve been in contact with are very aware of that fact. That’s why telemetry is so big right now. Everybody is building datasets in the hopes of fine tuning smaller, cheaper models once they have enough good quality data.
xavier666@lemm.ee 2 weeks ago
My company is realizing that hosting a model which will be private, cost-effective, and performing better than traditional algorithms is like finding a unicorn. Few months back, the top execs were jumping around GenAI like a bunch of kids. Fortunately, the Sr. research head beat some sense into them.
falkerie71@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
You’re lucky there’s a higher up that could talk down the even higher ups. Though, sometimes it’s not even about the r&d teams.
I saw company wide HR educational emails or courses telling you how to improve you work quality/efficiency, and one of them tells us to “research AI” and learn how to utilize it, talking about how great it is and improved the work efficiency by 30%. Sure, it has its uses, but I won’t go touting how great it is. And with how ChatGPT works, you have to be the biggest idiot in the world to upload all your sensitive stuff to ChatGPT just for it to make a spreadsheet faster. But without these disclaimers in the email, I doubt regular clerical staff knows about this, and it’s extremely dangerous.
Zos_Kia@lemmynsfw.com 2 weeks ago
What kind of use-cases was it, where you didn’t find suitable local models to work with ? I’ve found that general “chatbot” things are hit and miss but more domain-constrained tasks (such as extracting structured entities from unstructured text) are pretty reliable even on smaller models. I’m not counting my chickens yet as my dataset is still somewhat small but preliminary testing has been very promising in that regard.