Also, how can they sue a company based in another country.
Comment on Wikipedia article blocked worldwide by Delhi high court.
douglasg14b@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
How can they block this for everyone?
pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 3 weeks ago
merde@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
i’m guessing that it must be like Xitter in Brazil. If a company is present in a country, they may require a legal representation which can be held accountable.
merde@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
it’s more of a blackmail. Wikipedia could have kept the article online for everybody but they would have deprived 1,5 billion people in India of the whole Wikipedia.
The judge on the case stated “If you don’t like India, please don’t work in India… We will ask government to block your site”.
On 21 October, the Wikimedia Foundation suspended access to the article for Asian News International vs. Wikimedia Foundation due to an order from the court.
Dot@feddit.org 3 weeks ago
Orginal Wikipedia Page.
SassyRamen@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
This just makes me want to see it more.
TheBlackLounge@lemm.ee 3 weeks ago
archive.ph/…/Asian_News_International_vs._Wikimed…
Smith6826@sopuli.xyz 3 weeks ago
Hello Streisand effect.
LockheedTheDragon@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
I think that part of the point of Wikimedia complying with the Order. Which you can read the Order at …wikipedia.org/…/Asian_News_International_vs._Wik… . Also the page the lawsuit is actually about is still up, but frozen.
njordomir@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Yeah, you know there’s bound to be some juicy drama if they want to remove it so bad.