Comment on Syncthing Android app discontinued
cmgvd3lw@discuss.tchncs.de 4 weeks ago
Sad day indeed, bitwarden going shady and this.
Comment on Syncthing Android app discontinued
cmgvd3lw@discuss.tchncs.de 4 weeks ago
Sad day indeed, bitwarden going shady and this.
calmluck9349@infosec.pub 4 weeks ago
What did bitwarden do??
Atemu@lemmy.ml 4 weeks ago
lemmy.ndlug.org/post/1268531
majestic@sh.itjust.works 4 weeks ago
I think it was made by mistake. They will more likely remove that dependency
486@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Perhaps the hard dependency was a mistake, but not them moving more and more code to their proprietary library. It appears that their intent is to make the client mostly a wrapper around their proprietary library, so they can still claim to have an open source GPLv3 piece of software.
ammonium@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Clearly not: github.com/bitwarden/clients/issues/11611#issueco…
smiletolerantly@awful.systems 4 weeks ago
Ahh those fuckers.
Carighan@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
I don’t get it.
How is that a problem to people wanting to work on or work with Bitwarden? Or am I misunderstanding the wording on it?
It just seems to say that you cannot rip this SDK out to use it on something else. Which makes sense as far as an internal library goes, at least on the surface?
ammonium@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
It doesn’t make sense for an internal library for an open source application, it that case it’s not open source.