Comment on Syncthing Android app discontinued

cmgvd3lw@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

• calmluck9349@infosec.pub ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  What did bitwarden do??

  source

  • Atemu@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    lemmy.ndlug.org/post/1268531

    source

    • majestic@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      I think it was made by mistake. They will more likely remove that dependency

      source

      • 486@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

        Perhaps the hard dependency was a mistake, but not them moving more and more code to their proprietary library. It appears that their intent is to make the client mostly a wrapper around their proprietary library, so they can still claim to have an open source GPLv3 piece of software.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • ammonium@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

        Clearly not: github.com/bitwarden/clients/issues/11611#issueco…

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • smiletolerantly@awful.systems ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      Ahh those fuckers.

      source
    • Carighan@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      I don’t get it.

      How is that a problem to people wanting to work on or work with Bitwarden? Or am I misunderstanding the wording on it?

      It just seems to say that you cannot rip this SDK out to use it on something else. Which makes sense as far as an internal library goes, at least on the surface?

      source

      • ammonium@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

        It doesn’t make sense for an internal library for an open source application, it that case it’s not open source.

        source