Comment

Comment on Concerns Raised Over Bitwarden Moving Further Away From Open-Source

pmc@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

They now require a non-free Bitwarden SDK component. That’s what this whole conversation is about.

Sort:hotnew top

sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
And the whole conversation is about a bug, not a change in direction…

Update: Bitwarden posted to X this evening to reaffirm that it’s a “packaging bug” and that “Bitwarden remains committed to the open source licensing model.”

source
fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
Only the desktop client. And the response is that not being able to compile sans SDK is an issue they will resolve.

I still think this is bad directionally, but we need to see what happens.

source