Comment on Concerns Raised Over Bitwarden Moving Further Away From Open-Source

• pmc@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  They now require a non-free Bitwarden SDK component. That’s what this whole conversation is about.

  source

  • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    And the whole conversation is about a bug, not a change in direction…

    Update: Bitwarden posted to X this evening to reaffirm that it’s a “packaging bug” and that “Bitwarden remains committed to the open source licensing model.”

    source
  • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Only the desktop client. And the response is that not being able to compile sans SDK is an issue they will resolve.

    I still think this is bad directionally, but we need to see what happens.

    source