Are you using “extremism” to mean “far from the status quo,” or “has absolute belief and violent justification for said belief?” Centrists can absolutely be the latter.
Comment on Lemmy's gaining popularity, so I thought new people should see this.
pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 weeks agocentrism isn’t extremism
Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 weeks ago
pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 weeks ago
i think more the first
Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 weeks ago
The others here are using it the second way, which I agree with. Centrism meaning the “status quo” can be violently and toxically upheld.
Edie@lemmy.ml 4 weeks ago
There were two “Reigns of Terror,” if we would but remember it and consider it; the one wrought murder in hot passion, the other in heartless cold blood; the one lasted mere months, the other had lasted a thousand years; the one inflicted death upon ten thousand persons, the other upon a hundred millions; but our shudders are all for the “horrors” of the minor Terror, the momentary Terror, so to speak; whereas, what is the horror of swift death by the axe, compared with lifelong death from hunger, cold, insult, cruelty, and heart-break? What is swift death by lightning compared with death by slow fire at the stake? A city cemetery could contain the coffins filled by that brief Terror which we have all been so diligently taught to shiver at and mourn over; but all France could hardly contain the coffins filled by that older and real Terror — that unspeakably bitter and awful Terror which none of us has been taught to see in its vastness or pity as it deserves.
Taken from redsails.org/the-two-terrors/
Diva@lemmy.ml 4 weeks ago
You can totally have centrist extremists