Okay, let’s take this reasoning even further then. Why can’t this same logic be used to a 3 year old?
To answer your question. They consider the argument of “where do you draw the line” to be a red herring.
Consider the following: if a person is in need for a kidney transplant, or else he would die, would it be ethical to force someone to donate their kidney against their will? I think not.
Same applies to abortions. You are being forced to feed a parasitic being in your body, a being that destroys your body in the process. And not having an option to abort would be to take away your bodily autonomy.
As for the line, I think that the person making that choice is the one that draws that line. It is not for us to decide.
Free_Opinions@feddit.uk 4 weeks ago
privatizetwiddle@lemmy.sdf.org 4 weeks ago
The same logic does work on a 3 year old. A parent is not forced to feed it and can have someone remove it. They just don’t call it abortion. adoption.com/how-to-give-a-child-up-for-adoption/
Maybe some day a fetus can be removed without killing it, but 3 year olds already have that ability.
Free_Opinions@feddit.uk 4 weeks ago
Then have the child and give it up for adoption? If you don’t want to keep it, you can freely abort it until, say, 12 weeks, after which you’d need a medical reason and a statement from one or two doctors. I don’t see what the issue is here.
I’m not saying this is exactly how it should be, but something along those lines. The idea that someone should be free to abort a 7-month-old fetus if they choose seems quite extreme to me.
Barometer3689@feddit.nl 4 weeks ago
Cause then it is no longer connected to your body? Why would the same logic apply here? I am confused what argument you are trying to make
hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 weeks ago
Because a 3 year old is SENTINENT. It can FEEL things, unlike a fetus.
Free_Opinions@feddit.uk 4 weeks ago
I’m pretty sure an 8-month-old fetus can feel things and is sentient, so that’s a moot point unless you’re going to argue that sentience appears at the moment of birth - which we both know isn’t true.
So… Why can’t we abort 3 year olds?
hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 weeks ago
Oh, you’re just a stupid reactionary. Get blocked idiot.
Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 4 weeks ago
Surely you can get rid of that ‘parasite’ in the first few months instead of waiting for the last minute? I don’t see how drawing the line at, say 12 weeks now somehow takes away a person’s bodily autonomy.
Speaking of a red herring, a comparison to a forced kidney donation is completely irrelevant here.
Barometer3689@feddit.nl 4 weeks ago
I disagree on that. It is a example of the emergency room variation of the trolley problem, as can be read further on here: simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trolley_problem?wprov=s…
Barometer3689@feddit.nl 4 weeks ago
Yup in practice it is probably less risky and less invasive to do it early for the host. But that is a separate question. I thought you meant to question the classic “when would it be considered murder” so that is what I responded to.