Comment on Lower Decks Season 5 Official Trailer!

• Zoot@reddthat.com ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Picard, and Disc had major issues focusing on one character. It tried to have a massive arch which then failed horribly in the eyes of some (S2 Picard, even S1 picard had me like wtf) Disc was fun as hell, and I enjoyed the time jump. Beyond that though, it just… Stops being coherent.

  Compared to Voy, DS9, or TNG where they do have an over reaching arxh, but every show is just a story, and the plot maybe progresses just a bit. Worked great, we got to love all the characters, and they each had their own personal touch you could fall in love with.

  All of that to say; LD, and SNW are top tier 10/10 and don’t have the issue of centering the show on one character.

  source
• becausechemistry@lemm.ee ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Don’t worry, I’m not the type of person you think I am. I have queer friends. My partner’s a bi she/they. I drive a Prius. I’m gonna vote for the woman of color here in a few weeks. Pretty cool of you to make that assumption, though.

  I actually really liked Disco S1 and kinda S2. But the whole “one special person across time and space” thing got kinda old. One person is always right. No matter what. That and the Discovery-is-special-ex-machina Burn alongside the ridiculous constantly-reconfiguring-geometry ships made me lose interest. I hear half the Disco bridge crew had like zero character development in the last season, and they just didn’t even bother having Detmer there for a lot of it.

  Strange New Worlds? Lower Decks? Hell yeah. Perfect Star Trek. 10/10. Disco and Picard? Trying too hard to make “prestige TV” and ending up forgetting why Star Trek is good: ensemble casts working together.

  source

  • Corgana@startrek.website ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    “one special person across time and space”

    I believe you, but I also remember those exact same words being applied to Sisko and Kirk but yet in my experience was not ever presented as a bad thing when applied to Kirk.

    I’m actually not a big Discovery fan, but my reasoning has nothing to do with the average screentime of a particular character.

    source

    • becausechemistry@lemm.ee ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      If one person says hey we should do this thing, and everyone else says no we shouldn’t based on the information we have, and it turns out that the one person was right because of things nobody knew at the time, that’s a boring plot device. When it happened multiple times, and then kinda all the time, I stopped watching.

      Kirk and Sisko sometimes disagreed with their crews. Sometimes they were wrong. Burnham was always right. And it got old.

      source

      • Corgana@startrek.website ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        If I can produce examples from the show of Burhnam being wrong would it change your opinion? Because while I’m sure you do not mean it this way, it feels icky to single out this particular character for the crime of “being special” when that “criticism” is (in my experience) almost never applied to other characters who’s actors have lower amounts of melanin in their skin.

        source

        • -> View More Comments