Comment on Telegram is exposing their users privacy.

• cm0002@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  So in your world, journalists and activists trying to bring attention to human rights violations their country’s fascist government is committing in an attempt to bring in good change should be just fucked over right?

  Because those governments label those people as “criminals” when they’re objectively not.

  source

  • helenslunch@feddit.nl ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    I’ll refer you to my previous comment:

    None of this is my opinion, it’s just how the world works

    Notice at no time did I use the words “should” or “should not”.

    source

    • Eheran@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      I love how you get downvoted by people who live in some sort of fictitious world. Kind of like the sovereign citizen nonsense.

      source
• Arkouda@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Can you elaborate?

  I just did.

  None of this is my opinion, it’s just how the world works LOL

  This may be of some use to you.

  www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/elaborate

  Which Government?

  I already answered this one as well.

  The gov typically need some sort of warrant, and they need approval from the country they’re requesting it from.

  United States of America? Canada? North Korea? China? Australia? Saudi Arabia? South Africa? Brazil?

  The point is the app was designed for secure communication, specifically from corrupt governments, which is why it is problematic to allow access to user data as long as the individual is breaking a law in that country.

  Or to use the example from the top:

  So who gets to pick what’s a lawful request and criminal activity? It’s criminal in some states to seek an abortion or help with an abortion, so would they hand out the IPs of those “criminals”? Because depending on who you ask some will tell you they’re basically murderers. And that’s just one example.

  source

  • helenslunch@feddit.nl ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    This may be of some use to you.

    Can you elaborate on what you’re asking me to elaborate on, because I honestly don’t know.

    United States of America? Canada? North Korea? China? Australia? Saudi Arabia? South Africa? Brazil?

    Yes.

    The point is the app was designed for secure communication, specifically from corrupt governments

    If you think that’s true, you are sorely mistaken. It may be how it is advertised, but it is not how it works.

    it is problematic to allow access to user data as long as the individual is breaking a law in that country.

    I agree. For the third time, this is not my opinion, this is just how the world works.

    Or to use my answer from the top:

    The…law?

    source