Comment on Possible AMD chips that were spychip-free as late as 2016
Mnem667@sh.itjust.works 1 week ago
Update: Corporate boot lickers are ironically thick in this forum> Lol. look dude, since it’s essentially just me here, I can only assume I’m the presumed “boot licker”.
I have multiple pieces of retro tech hanging around here, from Palm devices, to an IBM XT, to Ataris, to a laptop that I just realized today has windows 10 still on dual-boot. I forgot because I have debian or something installed on the SSD (windows on the MMC). I don’t want to run android OS, but given the current state of things, using my phone with a custom ROM has to suffice.
All that to say, I appreciate your stance, and the investigation. I understand where you’re coming from, and I get the general concept. I don’t want closed-source hardware either. There’s a ton of personal reasons why not, and none of them are compatible with the corporate interests of today.
But, for your mental and social health, you should really maybe take a step back, clear your mind, and read some of the things that are here. The horse your riding on is so high, I’m not even sure you can see the grass, let alone touch it. The intentional use of inflammatory language, the not actually answering a question, but running rampant on a separate diatribe, and the fact that you’re about a hop skip and jump from actually saying “DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH!” is making me immediately not give a rats about what your intentions are because I don’t want to interact with you. At this point, I’m willing to bet that you refer to the general public as “normies”. You are only a stone’s throw from a Truther or other fun conspiracy nut.
Block me if you’d like, ain’t no skin off my nose. But you really should try to extract yourself from the rabbit hole, take some some to reassess where you are and where you are going, and maybe just try being a little less abrasive and self-centered.
evenwicht@lemmy.sdf.org 1 week ago
That advice is good for the pragmatist who does not give a shit about ethics.
This is not how you convince ethical consumers to ditch ethics and take the pragmatic selfish path. Ethical consumers do not patronize enshitifiers.
The question was irrelevant threadcrap. You need to lower your expectations when you bring uncivil commentary.
It’s more like: GET YOUR OWN THREAD.
This is exactly how normies view those w/infosec backgrounds. We opt for security by default and require justified cause to make a compromise. The normie mindset is to flip that around and prioritize convenience while requiring a reason to do security.