evenwicht
@evenwicht@lemmy.sdf.org
- Comment on Laptop specs dataset wanted. Would be useful to find 2012—14 Windows 8 era laptops. 5 days ago:
That’s something different. The PSP is separate and runs parallel to the TPM. The two coexist because they serve different purposes. “As of 2025, a TPM is provided by nearly all PC and notebook manufacturers in their products.” So 12 years following the introduction of the PSP, the TPM is still in play.
I thought the TPM was relatively innocuous for those not running oppressive software. But perhaps I should revisit this, considering this from wikipedia:
“In 2015, Richard Stallman suggested replacing the term “trusted computing” with the term “treacherous computing” due to the danger that the computer can be made to systematically disobey its owner if the cryptographical keys are kept secret from them.”
I previously thought TPM had no remote relationships. But remote attestation is certainly an anti-feature if the hardware can talk to the cloud without the control of users on a FOSS platform. Is that the concern that you have? I need to get a handle on this.
- Comment on Laptop specs dataset wanted. Would be useful to find 2012—14 Windows 8 era laptops. 6 days ago:
Perhaps you need uMatrix to go far enough to trigger their protectionism.
- Submitted 6 days ago to retrocomputing@lemmy.sdf.org | 5 comments
- Submitted 2 weeks ago to retrocomputing@lemmy.sdf.org | 4 comments
- Comment on Getting an old Computer online with Android Ethernet tethering - 82MHz 2 weeks ago:
Only works if the phone is modern enough to have usb-c plus you must buy some hardware from Amazon. Fuck that.
If you have a FOSS router laying around, you can simply put it into wifi bridge mode which inverts the wi-fi so it’s used to connect to the uplink, while the ethernet ports serve up the cloud. No need for a phone.
If you have a spare non-FOSS router w/USB and phone, the router may be able to usb-tether to the phone. E.g. a Fritzbox would likely work for that.
- Comment on Cannot create new communities 2 weeks ago:
The community is the first of its kind. There is nothing in the fedi with the same name, past or present.
- Submitted 2 weeks ago to sdfpubnix@lemmy.sdf.org | 5 comments
- Comment on Cannot find !foss_requests@libretechni.ca from sdf 5 weeks ago:
Anything made in that period is inaccessible from our local instance,
Why would it be? It makes no sense that age matters. I just arbitrarily searched for a community that was newly created on one instance from another instance, and it was found. I had to wait around 3 seconds because the check is done in realtime.
- Submitted 1 month ago to sdfpubnix@lemmy.sdf.org | 3 comments
- Comment on Cubieboard users abandoned? Trying to find support docs & software. 2 months ago:
Thanks! That was helpful!
- Submitted 2 months ago to selfhosting@slrpnk.net | 3 comments
- Comment on Are there any FOSS NAS servers for a Marvell arm SOC? 2 months ago:
Looks like a good tip. Found this:
- Comment on Are there any FOSS NAS servers for a Marvell arm SOC? 2 months ago:
The specs say it’s Marvell 6281 1.2GHz… not sure what that is but the search leads to some deeper specs for a RISC CPU that is both 32bit and 16bit. The info is dicey because “6281” does not appear in those docs. In any case, I suspect you’re right, that it’s not 64 bit.
- Submitted 2 months ago to selfhosting@slrpnk.net | 5 comments
- Comment on What was the Windows 3.0/1 graphical alternative that also ran on DOS? 5 months ago:
No, I figured if I could recall the name I could get a nostalgic fix by searching it. I found this:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DESQview
I recall DESQview was much lighter weight and better performing than Windows, but had limitations. I did not recall that the windows were text only within, but that’s starting to fill some holes in my memory.
- Comment on What was the Windows 3.0/1 graphical alternative that also ran on DOS? 5 months ago:
To be fair, I was quite vague. I think there are multiple right answers… but I recalled one starting w/a ‘D’ and that’s what I was trying to recall.
- Comment on What was the Windows 3.0/1 graphical alternative that also ran on DOS? 5 months ago:
In those days, DOS was the OS. Windows and DESQview were just window manager apps that ran other apps.
- Comment on What was the Windows 3.0/1 graphical alternative that also ran on DOS? 5 months ago:
What is that? I don’t think that’s what I had in mind. I think it’s DESQview I was trying to think of. Anyway, not important… it was just driving me nuts I could not remember.
- Submitted 5 months ago to retrocomputing@lemmy.sdf.org | 26 comments