evenwicht
@evenwicht@lemmy.sdf.org
- Comment on Cubieboard users abandoned? Trying to find support docs & software. 3 weeks ago:
Thanks! That was helpful!
- Submitted 3 weeks ago to selfhosting@slrpnk.net | 3 comments
- Comment on Are there any FOSS NAS servers for a Marvell arm SOC? 4 weeks ago:
Looks like a good tip. Found this:
- Comment on Are there any FOSS NAS servers for a Marvell arm SOC? 4 weeks ago:
The specs say it’s Marvell 6281 1.2GHz… not sure what that is but the search leads to some deeper specs for a RISC CPU that is both 32bit and 16bit. The info is dicey because “6281” does not appear in those docs. In any case, I suspect you’re right, that it’s not 64 bit.
- Submitted 4 weeks ago to selfhosting@slrpnk.net | 5 comments
- Comment on What was the Windows 3.0/1 graphical alternative that also ran on DOS? 3 months ago:
No, I figured if I could recall the name I could get a nostalgic fix by searching it. I found this:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DESQview
I recall DESQview was much lighter weight and better performing than Windows, but had limitations. I did not recall that the windows were text only within, but that’s starting to fill some holes in my memory.
- Comment on What was the Windows 3.0/1 graphical alternative that also ran on DOS? 3 months ago:
To be fair, I was quite vague. I think there are multiple right answers… but I recalled one starting w/a ‘D’ and that’s what I was trying to recall.
- Comment on What was the Windows 3.0/1 graphical alternative that also ran on DOS? 3 months ago:
In those days, DOS was the OS. Windows and DESQview were just window manager apps that ran other apps.
- Comment on What was the Windows 3.0/1 graphical alternative that also ran on DOS? 3 months ago:
What is that? I don’t think that’s what I had in mind. I think it’s DESQview I was trying to think of. Anyway, not important… it was just driving me nuts I could not remember.
- Submitted 3 months ago to retrocomputing@lemmy.sdf.org | 26 comments