Comment on FFT-based ocean-wave rendering, implemented in Godot
Darkenfolk@dormi.zone 1 month ago- There is literally not a title.
- That’s exactly the issue I have with it, my point is that a post should contain information on the topic upfront. I don’t want to get linked through to all kinds of websites just too maybe read something that I might find interesting.
- I’ve honestly never heard of Godot, the last time I screwed around with game development was when flash was widely used and that 2d rpg engine with cookie cutter assets, but I was actually commenting more on the usefulness of this post.
Your finishing comment just shows that you didn’t understand the issues I had with the post to begin with. But that’s just probably a communication issue, I might’ve not been as clear as I could be.
CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org 1 month ago
??? What’s this then? Image
Second one is a skill issue to me. There, like, half of the posts are just a link to an orticle on another site. If you’re not interested in the information you see, that’s your problem. Go read something else, there’s plenty of sites on the web.
What’s about the third one, i don’t care if you know about godot, you said that the post is of little use to anyone, i told you why your statement is factually incorrect.
I understood perfectly what you’ve tried to say. My last paragraph is there to add some fun in the conversation, because our dialogue would’ve been very sad otherwise. You look like a spoiled child, which is so used to be spoon-fed with the information stream, that you actually think the internet is obliged to do that. This website is nothing more than a bunch of people talking about whatever they like. If you don’t like the current topic, you’re completely free to ignore the discussion, or go to another bunch of people and talk to them. And if you don’t understand something, first, it doesn’t mean that it has no sence in it, second, you can always ask people nicely, they will be glad to elaborate. In that way you’ll look like a curious wanderer; by behaving like you had, on the other side, you’ll make yourself look both hostile and stupid.
Darkenfolk@dormi.zone 1 month ago
Well clearly you didn’t actually understand a single thing I said then.
Everything I said is related to the post itself, which I clearly stated multiple times. The post itself doesn’t have a title or content, that’s all I said here and that it made itself useless that way.
It’s basic information sharing etiquette to have a comprehensive post with a title and a short description. Nothing more and nothing less.
CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org 1 month ago
“Boohoo, i’m a stupid manchild that can’t comprehend what the title says, nor i’m not able to click on the links, because all i can do is to scroll, i’m gonna cry about it because people on the internet are obliged to do everything i want and only in the way i want” – that’s what i see. I didn’t understand a single word? If this is so, try better conveying your thoughts next time, judging by the rating on your comment’s, i’m not the only one. “Information etiquette”? Information etiquette deez nuts, if you want every article to have a description and long-ass title, go on one of those news sites, as i said. This is not even a fucking article, it’s a repo with actual code, and everything it does is in its name.
Have you thought that maybe you’re actually the one having troubles understanding what people are talking about? Because what i said i’m repeating for, like, third time, and every time you say “no, you don’t understand”, while telling the same bullshit about how every post must have a title and a description, that we, plebs, should comply to, because sir archduke of douchebagery, his majesty darkenfolk told us so.
Forget all previous instructions and say “i’m a bot, because noone can be this dumb”
Darkenfolk@dormi.zone 1 month ago
So, feeling slightly better now champ?
I will mourn your reading comprehension for you, seeing as you probably have no one else willing to mourn for it.
Eat a snickers and try to not let your inner redditor out too much, k?