Comment on OpenAI Execs Mass Quit as Company Removes Control From Non-Profit Board and Hands It to Sam Altman
exanime@lemmy.world 1 month agoIt’s expensive enough my employer (of more than 2000) decided to only trial it with a small subset of seniors. It’s not just the license, it comes tied up with new hardware
So far nobody likes it. Most people use it to summarize meetings and we just got a memo saying we need to review the summaries because it keeps missing important data
Having said all that, when I mentioned the cost, I was referring to the cost of training the models. And without a proper business plan to monetize it, it’s is still unclear how this version of AI could be actually sold for profit.
Remember that cost, is not just a number. It’s the number in relationships with the benefit it provides.
For OpenAI, it has yet to produce profit that is not just venture capital and for us as user (us, I cannot speak for everyone) it has not saved us a dime after getting expensive hardware and licenses
Bongles@lemm.ee 1 month ago
I’ve only made the comment you’re replying to. I’m not whoever you’re thinking.
exanime@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Yes, my bad, apologies
I thought you were the person I replied to originally
Bongles@lemm.ee 1 month ago
All good. I think we’re thinking of this from different aspects anyway. I’m thinking a company just subscribes as part of their office subscription and Microsoft is doing the heavy lifting of the cost and hardware. I don’t know how OpenAI makes money besides their little subscription.
exanime@lemmy.world 1 month ago
As far as I have read, that’s it, which is not profitable. They have been coasting on Venture Capital only so far.
Smokeydope@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Yeah, I choose to not get involved in debating with someone more interested in spitting out five paragraph essays than bothering to double check if they’re still talking to the same person.
exanime@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Lol oh the irony