Comment

Hmm, I’m having trouble understanding the syntax of your statement.

Is it (People who use LLMs to write code incorrectly) (perceived their code to be more secure) (than code written by expert humans.)

Or is it (People who use LLMs to write code) (incorrectly perceived their code to be more secure) (than code written by expert humans.)

Sort:hotnew top

nfms@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
The “statement” was taken from the study.

We conduct the first large-scale user study examining how users interact with an AI Code assistant to solve a variety of security related tasks across different programming languages. Overall, we find that participants who had access to an AI assistant based on OpenAI’s codex-davinci-002 model wrote significantly less secure code than those without access. Additionally, participants with access to an AI assistant were more likely to believe they wrote secure code than those without access to the AI assistant. Furthermore, we find that participants who trusted the AI less and engaged more with the language and format of their prompts (e.g. re-phrasing, adjusting temperature) provided code with fewer security vulnerabilities. Finally, in order to better inform the design of future AI-based Code assistants, we provide an in-depth analysis of participants’ language and interaction behavior, as well as release our user interface as an instrument to conduct similar studies in the future.

source
simplymath@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
I intended B, but A is also true, no?

source