Comment on Microsoft inks deal to restart Three Mile Island nuclear reactor to fuel its voracious AI ambitions

• finitebanjo@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  The creators who made the LLM boom said they cannot improve it any more with the current technique due to diminishing returns.

  It’s worthless in its current state.

  Should be dying out faster imo.

  source

  • oatscoop@midwest.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    One of the major problems with LLMs is it’s a “boom”. People are rightfully soured on them as a concept because jackasses trying to make money lie about their capabilities and utility – never mind the ethics of obtaining the datasets used to train them.

    They’re absolutely limited, flawed, and there are better solutions for most problems … but beyond the bullshit LLMs are a useful tool for some jobs and they’re not going away.

    source

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      I cannot think of one single application where an LLM is better or even equivalent than having a person do the job. It’s real only use is to trade human workers for cheaper but inferior output, at the cost of mankind as a whole because we have in excess labor and in shortage power.

      source

      • oatscoop@midwest.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        There are jobs where it’s not feasible or practical to pay an actual human to do.

        Human translators exist and are far superior to machine translators. Do you hire one every time you need something translated in a casual setting, or do you use something Google translate? LLMs are the reason modern machine translation is is infinitely better than it was a few years ago.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • Enoblk@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    That’s one groups opinion, we still see improving LLMs I’m sure they will continue to improve and be adapted for whatever future use we need them. I mean I personally find them great in their current state for what I use them for

    source

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      What skin do you have in this game? Leading industry experts, who btw want to SELL IT TO YOU, told you it has hit a ceiling. Why do you refute it so much? Let it die, we will all be better off.

      source

      • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Even if it didn’t improve further there are still uses for LLMs we have today. That’s only one kind of AI as well, the kind that makes all the images and videos is completely separate. That has come on a long way too.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • Enoblk@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        I use them regularly for personal and work projects, they work great at outlining what I need to do in a project as well as identifying oversights in my project. If industry experts are saying this, then why are there still improvements being made, why are they still providing value to people, just because you don’t use them doesn’t mean they aren’t useful.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • iopq@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    There are always new techniques and improvements. If you look at the current state, we haven’t even had a slowdown

    source

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Nah fuck off lmao

      source
• AEsheron@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  I suspect you’re right. But there really is never a good way to tell with these kinds of experimental techs. It could be a runaway chain of improvement. Or it is probably even odds that there is a visible and clear decline before it peters out, or just suddenly slams into a beick wall with no warning.

  source