Comment on The reason we don’t see exploding battery attacks more often is not because it’s technically hard, it’s because the erosion of public trust in everyday things isn’t worth it.

• breadsmasher@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  alrighty then. Dig your heels in.

  source

  • cypherpunks@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    i encourage you to re-read the original comment in this thread after reading the article 😂

    source

    • breadsmasher@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      You should do the same.

      source

      • cypherpunks@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        (@Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee:) Just to be clear, the pager thing wasn’t exploding batteries, they had apparently been modified at the production level to have explosives in them, which could be triggered by the pager system itself.

        (me:) Did you read the article? It sounds like you didn’t.

        (you:) The article literally talks about inserting an explosive layer inside the battery at production. Just like the comment said.

        I am really curious: can you tell me, do you actually think the first commenter in fact read the article and was agreeing with its suggestion that the batteries could have been manufactured with explosives inside of them?

        (you): It isn’t “any batteries can explode”.

        Nobody claimed that, but in retrospect I guess I can see how, read alone, the pull quote I selected from the article to be the title of this post could be interpreted that way.

        source
    • nick@midwest.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Delete this entire post or shut up, bro. You’re being nuked with downvotes.

      source