Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 1 month ago
Just to be clear, the pager thing wasn’t exploding batteries, they had apparently been modified at the production level to have explosives in them, which could be triggered by the pager system itself.
Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 1 month ago
Just to be clear, the pager thing wasn’t exploding batteries, they had apparently been modified at the production level to have explosives in them, which could be triggered by the pager system itself.
cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
Did you read the article? It sounds like you didn’t.
breadsmasher@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Did you read it?
The article literally talks about inserting an explosive layer inside the battery at production. Just like the comment said.
It isn’t “any batteries can explode”.
cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
What? 🤦 The comment I replied to said:
It seems clear that “they had apparently been modified at the production level” is referring to the pagers, rather than their batteries. But the article is explaining how it could have been that the batteries were the part of the pager that had the explosives (in which case it was the battery that was exploding).
breadsmasher@lemmy.world 1 month ago
You are inferring what someone meant, and then applying some super pedantic reasoning.
When manufacturing pagers, that includes the pager electronics, the case, and the battery.
The batteries themselves unmodified, standard batteries were not somehow hacked to explode. At some point in the manufacturing of the pagers which includes the battery, explosives were included.
ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee 1 month ago
Most other people wont be reading it either so I don’t see an issue with pointing out the obvious misconception people could make based on the headline that talks about exploding batteries.
Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 1 month ago
Of course not, what did you expect?
cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
I encourage you to, it’s pretty interesting.
Darkenfolk@dormi.zone 1 month ago
The post content should’ve been in the actual post. No offence.