Comment on Elon Musk destroys astronomy

MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

• qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  this was always bound to happen as we expand our presence in space.

  Yes and no — from a different article:

  Radiation associated with Starlink satellites was detected at observing frequencies between 110 and 188 MHz, which is well below the 10.7- 12.7 GHz radio frequencies used for the downlink communication signals.

  (The original article said 5M radiation, which should be around 60MHz.)

  So Starlink is emitting RF in spectrum where they shouldn’t, which is avoidable, but takes effort.

  My guess, and I could be wrong, is that this could be related to something other than the radio(s), such as switching power supplies finding opportunistic structures from which to radiate.

  source

  • Comment105@lemm.ee ⁨21⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Starlink seems like a genuinely interesting and useful technology, in some ways.

    But it also seems like it might not be worth having.

    I’m thinking they might need to be deorbited, but I’m not confident in that yet. It sounds like it might be fixable in a new generation of Internet constellation satellites.

    Idk how long the issue should be tolerated to wait for that, though. And while Starlink has a good amount of customers this kind of Internet is genuinely useful for, it’s still not a lot compared to all the other internet services.

    source

    • frezik@midwest.social ⁨18⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      China is putting up their own equivalent system. Terrestrial radio telescopes are fucked.

      Time for a moon base.

      source