Comment on Google Search To Show If An Image Is AI Generated, Edited Or Taken With Camera.
conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 1 day agoThe device is no more anyone else’s business than anything else.
It should absolutely not be shared by default.
Comment on Google Search To Show If An Image Is AI Generated, Edited Or Taken With Camera.
conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 1 day agoThe device is no more anyone else’s business than anything else.
It should absolutely not be shared by default.
SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 1 day ago
To prove the legibility of the image? It’s a great data point that’s pretty anonymous, they don’t need to include the Mac, sim, serial or other information.
conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
A. It’s not even the weakest of weak evidence of whether a photo is legitimate. It tells you literally zero.
B. Even if it was concrete proof, that would still be a truly disgusting reason to think you were entitled to that information.
SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 1 day ago
You can use metadata to prove an image is real, you can’t prove something is real without it, so it’s the o to current option. It tell you a lot, you just don’t want people to k ow it apparently, but that doesn’t change it can be used to legitimatize an image.
What’s disgusting about knowing if an image was taken on a Sony dslr, and Android or an iPhone? And entitled…? This is so you can prove your image is real? The hell you talking about here?
conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
No, you cannot use metadata to prove an image is real. It is less than trivial to fake.
Most photos on the internet are camera phones, and you absolutely are not entitled to know what phone someone has. Knowing someone’s phone has infinitely more value to fingerprinting a user than including metadata could ever theoretically have to demonstrate whether a photo is legitimate or not.
Photos without a specific, on record provenance from a credible source are no longer useful for evidence of anything. You cannot go back from that.