Comment on Why is the internet overflowing with rubbish ads – and what can we do about it?

• webghost0101@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  I have nothing against having the option to donate, which has worked for many projects.

  The idea you are sketching, it is a possible reality but that is the bad future to me.

  There’s a threshold where the number of users makes it impossible for your service to still have any real sense of identity or intend and it ought to be broken up in smaller parts. Some of the larger instances have already passed that threshold in my opinion.

  You did mention the solution, “The alternative is possible small scale” The good future is where every family has their own private instance and every business and service has their own public one, interconnected trough the fediverse.

  Keep things small, manageable, and responsible.

  I also agree its likely this won’t last, not with so many predators waiting to grab a piece. Web3 is not here yet, as much as meta threads want to believe we are it.

  source

  • atrielienz@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    That doesn’t sound reasonable for a lot of reasons. The idea that each family can host their own instance (which still has costs, and as you reasonably pointed out can’t generally be done with a server in the basement because of broadband laws preventing that kind of usage, is kind of ludicrous. That would lead to an internet where only people with money would be able to host a website of any kind. And even then, public services (video hosting, cloud storage, news, any kind of public service or so on) wouldn’t get anything out of the deal so why would they let you connect to them and mirror their content?

    Also, if we keep things small scale, social networks die because new people aren’t coming in to replace dead accounts as people leave. So what happens then? Those social networks die. Social network sites like Lemmy and mastodon and so on need people. Without people to post content and people to consume it the site is basically just an empty husk of random 1’s and 0’s.

    Keep things responsible? How do we do that? You’ve given me an outline of an idea you have but it’s all broad strokes and no details.

    source

    • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      There is a lot to unpack here. I think you misunderstand how the fediverse we’re part of is designed for the dynamic I’m explaining.

      First, I never claimed not everyone can afford self-hosting servers (that do not neef to be) in their basement. You might be mixing up someone else’s comment.

      Modern modems are already built with similar hardware to what’s needed for self-hosting a small domain. Computers have become so cheap and accessible that self-hosting is trivial. For example, a Raspberry Pi can host a small website for under $50.

      I’m curious where you live that self-hosting is illegal. That’s a law I’d find so repulsive I’d need to break it on principle.

      Your ideas about decentralized systems seem contradictory. You say only the rich could host under fediverse, but also believe it’s illegal to self-host?

      Dont ask why big centralized services would connect to ours and instead ask what reason we have to connect to centralized systems. I run my own cloud server; it’s cheaper than a subscriptions. People are designing decentralized video hosting systems like PeerTube where everyone hosts their own videos. The proof is all around you here.

      The fediverse operates exactly how you say is impossible. The question isn’t why big servers would allow connections, but why I’d connect to centralized domains with so many decentralized alternatives available.

      It’s surprising you’re here without knowing this. Maybe it’s a sign decentralization is going mainstream?

      You asked a broad outline.

      Here’s how decentralized social media and web 3 actually works, right here and now. 

      1. Instead of one central server, there are many independent servers (instances) run by different individuals or groups.

      2. You create an account on one instance, but can interact with users on any instance.

      3. When you post, it’s stored on your home instance. Other instances your followers are on fetch and display your post to them.

      4. If you want to follow someone on another instance, your server connects to theirs to get their posts. (The ability to connect = federated)

      5. Each instance owner sets their own rules and can choose which other instances to federate with.

      6. You can move your account between instances, taking your followers with you. (Wip) 

      7. Popular fediverse platforms like Mastodon, Lemmy, and PeerTube all work this way, allowing cross-platform interaction.

      This system allows for a social media experience similar to centralized platforms, but with more user control and privacy. No single entity owns all the data or controls the entire network.

      Here is video from the Free Software Foundation which is a great source if you want to learn more about the hows and why.

      https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/user-liberation-watch-and-share-our-new-video

      source