Comment on No More Debates, No More Mistakes
wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 6 days agoYet her goal is to influence voters which she didn’t do. So really she didn’t win anything. It’s weird how the left thinks acting foolish wins a debate.
Debates are to change the views of voters to win the election. As of now, Trump is expected to beat Harris in the election.
So what did she “win”?
Hmmm did I say she won anything? Once again proving your inability to read.
Trump made a fool of himself then went on to say how everyone agrees he won. He rambled about disproven claims and didn’t bring up any real policy. It’s weird how the right thinks acting foolish wins a debate. Anyone that was positively influenced by his debate performance is a fucking moron because that was even more embarrassing than Biden’s debate
Just imagine beholding Trump, everything from his very foolish appearance, to the horrible things he says, his complete lack of understanding about almost every issues (dumbfuck is still acting like other countries pay tariffs, to say nothing of retaliation and trade wars), his deranged ramblings, moody insults, defensiveness, and not being repulsed. What the fuck is wrong with republicans?
Zeppo@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
“Acting foolish” in what way exactly? She actually expressed ideas for policy and acted professional while Trump just whined, attacked with lies and moaned in a slovenly way, with a few notable outbursts about bullshit.
Expected by whom? That does not seem to be the consensus in any media I consume or with people I’ve talked to.
wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 2 days ago
she constantly lied and never really answered a question.
The experts. Nate Silver predicts that Trump’s odds are at 65%.
Zeppo@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
That’s a wild analysis about her lying constantly. It’s so bizarre that someone would hear trumps endless spew of nonsense and then say that about Harris.
Sorry to have to mention reality, but that is not what Silver is saying currently:
…fivethirtyeight.com/2024-election-forecast/
wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 2 days ago
Just noticed you cited 538 when I was citing Nate Silver. 538 has nothing to do with Nate Silver. He left some time ago and has called out the bad changes to their model.
wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 2 days ago
It’s weird that I mentioned Kamala and that you kick in talking about Trump. Are you unable to talk about Kamala?
news.yahoo.com/…/nate-silver-slammed-over-trump-1…
No, that is what he has been saying.
Last week, for instance, his forecast gave Trump a 64% chance of winning the Electoral College while giving Vice President Kamala Harris just a 35% chance of victory, even while the same forecast saw Harris as more likely to win the popular vote and his polling averages had her leading in enough swing states to take the election.
You article is from today, so I will have to read that.