I disagree. A dumbphone (in my opinion) is a phone that does everything you need and nothing you don’t. And especially one that DOES NOT run Android. Email is unfortunately essential in the modern age.
But you do you, fam.
Comment on Mudita Kompakt - E-ink (truly) dumbphone with FOSS OS.
athairmor@lemmy.world 2 months ago
That’s not a dumbphone. It has email, a camera, an e-reader and , looks like, a few other apps.
I disagree. A dumbphone (in my opinion) is a phone that does everything you need and nothing you don’t. And especially one that DOES NOT run Android. Email is unfortunately essential in the modern age.
But you do you, fam.
While I get your opinion, these things have definitions. Here’s a super simple version:
So yes, this is a feature phone from what I’ve read of the translation.
And who decided these definitions, and what makes them an authority?
Several decades of phone technology as it developed…
Since we’re just making up definitions, a dumb phone is now a type of salad.
I need to get more dumb phones in my diet.
Just because we have different interpretations doesn’t mean we’re “making up definitions”. Who made you the definitive authority?
Teanut@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Mobile phones in the era before smartphones had cameras, email clients, games, music players, and even web browsers. They just weren’t very good at those functions and their core feature was being a phone for voice calls. Texting was barely a feature on some of them (the first camera phone in the United States, the Sanyo SCP-5300, didn’t have a two way text messaging client - the user had to go to a website on the phone to send texts, which was inconvenient even on a 1xRTT 3G connection.)
The e-ink phone seems closer to a dumbphone than a smartphone, IMO, largely because it lacks access to an app store.
Source: I sold mobile phones before smartphones and during the early smartphone years (BlackBerry and Palm Treo, for example.)