Comment

The dear people at the USB Forum should be rewarded with the Nobel prize in namology for their clear, superior and non-confusing naming scheme and naming process that even the nerdiest of nerds can’t follow.

source

Sort:hotnew top

Alex6511@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago
This has already been fixed by the forum FYI, the new spec is to just put clear text labels that denote the capability of the port. I can’t find the article I read but this one has an example of the new user-facing branding.

tidbits.com/2022/09/29/usb-simplifies-branding/

source
- Plopp@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago
  
  Behind the scenes, here’s what those labels correspond to:
  
  USB 5Gbps: USB 3.0 and 3.1 Gen 1 USB 10Gbps: USB 3.1 Gen 2, 3.2 Gen 2×1, and 3.2 Gen 1×2 USB 20Gbps: USB 3.2 Gen 2×2 USB 40Gbps: USB4’s initial version as currently shipping
  
  That’s cool. But even though it finally adds simplicity, it’s still yet another renaming of the same things.
  
  Here’s a snippet from an article from 2019:
  
  The upcoming 20 Gb/s USB 3.2 connection, which offers twice the speeds of the previous iteration, will be known as ‘USB 3.2 Gen 2x2’. Its predecessor, ‘USB 3.1’ will be rebranded to ‘USB 3.2 Gen 2’, while ‘USB 3.0’, which ran at 5 Gb/s speeds, will be termed ‘USB 3.2 Gen 1’.
  
  Reading that I want to shoot myself, and even the latest change, which probably is a good one, drives me slightly mad due to the history of renaming everything so many times.
  
  source
  - s_s@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago
    
    the history of renaming everything so many times.
    
    Every time a new USB spec comes out the version number goes up. A new spec comes out because they add more features. The spec is a whitepaper that explains all the features.
    
    If you just never used the version numbers to mean something that they never meant (transfer speeds) then literally none of this is confusing.
    
    They’ve officially renamed the transfer speeds one time after people made a big huff. here’s how they changed:
    
    USB SuperSpeed -> USB 5Gbps
    
    USB SuperSpeed 10Gbps -> USB 10Gbps
    
    USB SuperSpeed 20Gpbs -> USB 20Gbps
    
    And If you can’t follow along with that, I’m really, really sorry. There’s not much I can do from a internet discussion board. XD
    
    source
- tal@lemmy.today ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago
  
  clear text labels
  
  The problem with using English anything is that while English is the most-widely-used language in the world, there are still a lot of people out there who don’t know it.
  
  The US has a history of just using English text for everything, because most people in the US can do English. Over in Europe, where the language situation is more-fragmented, I think that there’s more push for using symbols, which…can have benefits, though it also means that everyone has to learn some symbols.
  
  Maybe “STOP” or “ON” and “OFF” or something aren’t that hard to learn. My gut is that maybe we could expect just about everyone in the world to learn a super-minimal subset of English using all-capital Latin letters or something for labeling purposes. But that thing has “CERTIFIED”, hardly the first thing someone learns. Also, it appears to have built a US trademark indicator and registered trademark indicator into various official labels, which I think is kind of funny. Like, if the USB guys go out and alter the registration status of their trademarks, are they gonna change the labels?
  
  Imagine all that text was a bunch of Chinese and imagine how palatable that’d be for the US market. Okay, it’s easier to learn the Latin alphabet than Chinese characters, which maybe makes the writing system easier to learn, but I can’t recognize a single Chinese character.
  
  source