In some senses the whole planet is storing a huge amount of energy underground.
But yeah I think in the context of this kind of discussion it’s would be a renewable energy source. While it’s probably technically not renewable, but there’s so much of it we’d never run out. I mean if you want to be super-pedantic, solar and wind aren’t renewable either because we don’t have a way to make a new sun when that thing burns out, but it’s like come on.
But probably not a storage solution, because why would you put energy into the Earth’s core? We worried about hell freezing over or something?
SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 1 week ago
Biomass and hydro* aren’t storage for intermittent power (*except pumped hydro). Rather they are natural sources of accumulated solar power that can be tapped on demand. In that sense, so is geothermal.
heftig@beehaw.org 1 week ago
Isn’t geothermal mostly nuclear power?
SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 week ago
Nah it’s friction from rocks banging into each other when the Earth was being formed. The surface of the Earth cooled down, but you dig down deep enough it gets really hot. Hot enough to melt rocks, or as the pros call it… “magma”. Dump some water down there and you get steam and you can drive a turbine with that steam. Though actual geothermal energy implementations are probably a little more complicated than that. But that’s the gist of it.
heftig@beehaw.org 1 week ago
Well, Wikipedia claims
In that sense, it’s the only renewable energy source we have that’s not indirectly powered by the sun. It’s most similar to (proper) nuclear power, but the latter isn’t “renewable” because it requires digging up fuel from the crust.