Comment on The Irony of 'You Wouldn't Download a Car' Making a Comeback in AI Debates
TriflingToad@lemmy.world 1 week ago
I don’t think LLMs should be taken down, it would be impossible for that to happen. I do, however think it should be forced into open source.
This is the only way. These companies are essentially asking for a free license for themselves while everyone else must pay.
“Copyright for thee but not for me.”
Will your warez be legal after you wrap them in an AI model, or only if you are a big, greedy, invasive, tech company?
Wow, thanks, I have not seen this comment, yet I hinted about this in some of my other replies that I’ve done before.
Yes, I think ML is fair use, but there it would also be fair to force something into the public domain/open source if, in order to be accrued, it has to make use of fair use at unseen amounts of scale.
This would be a difficult to make law, though. Current ML is very inefficient in the amount of data it requires, but it could (and should) be made better.
Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Yes. I’d also add that current copyright laws are archaic and counterproductive when combined with modern technology.
Creators need protection, but only for 15 years. Not death + 70 years.