Comment on We can post about feeding on them just not about feeding them

• Enkers@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  It’s implicit. If consent was given, it wouldn’t be exploitative. (And obviously, that’s contingent upon non-coersion.)

  source

  • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    common definitions of exploitation make no mention of consent either.

    source

    • Enkers@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      What? Where are you looking, the dictionary?

      plato.stanford.edu/entries/exploitation/

      Consent is mentioned plenty.

      source

      • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

        three mentions across 2 paragraphs. all of the mentions imply that consent would somehow relieve accusations of exploitation, but that isn’t established in your article for a certainty, and at best i’d say it’s debatable. i don’t care to debate about it. it’s clear that the vulgar use of the term is unrelated entirely.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

        encyclopedias are not dictionaries

        source

        • -> View More Comments