I mean, you’re not necessarily wrong. But that doesn’t change the fact that it’s still stealing, which was my point. Just because laws haven’t caught up to it yet doesn’t make it any less of a shitty thing to do.
Comment on The Irony of 'You Wouldn't Download a Car' Making a Comeback in AI Debates
freeman@sh.itjust.works 1 week agoIt’s not a breach of copyright or other IP law not to cite sources on your paper.
Getting your paper rejected for lacking sources is also not infringing in your freedom. Being forced to pay damages and delete your paper from any public space would be infringement of your freedom.
TommySoda@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Octopus1348@lemy.lol 1 week ago
When I analyze a melody I play on a piano, I see that it reflects the music I heard that day or sometimes, even music I heard and liked years ago.
Having parts similar or a part that is (coincidentally) identical to a part from another song is not stealing and does not infringe upon any law.
takeda@lemmy.world 1 week ago
You guys are missing a fundamental point. The copyright was created to protect an author for specific amount of time so somebody else doesn’t profit from their work essentially stealing their deserved revenue.
LLM AI was created to do exactly that.
freeman@sh.itjust.works 1 week ago
It’s not stealing, its not even ‘piracy’ which also is not stealing.
Copyright laws need to be scaled back, to not criminalize socially accepted behavior, not expand.
ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee 1 week ago
It’s not stealing though. The original source material is still there. They just made a copy of it. Just like online pirates do.
TommySoda@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Well they make a profit off of it, so yes. I have nothing against piracy, but if you’re reselling it that’s a different story.
ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee 1 week ago
But piracy saves you money which is effectively the same as making a profit. Also, it’s not just that they’re selling other people’s work for profit. You’re also paying for the insane amount of computing power it takes to train and run the AI plus salaries of the workers etc.
explore_broaden@midwest.social 1 week ago
I’m pretty sure that it’s true that citing sources isn’t really relevant to copyright violation, either you are violating or not. Saying where you copied from doesn’t change anything, but if you are using some ideas with your own analysis and words it isn’t a violation either way.
Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 1 week ago
With music this often ends up in civil court. Pretty sure the same can in theory happen for written texts, but the commercial value of most written texts is not worth the cost of litigation.