most lilely money laundering. Not really a new scam just adding AI to an old one
smokin_shinobi@lemmy.world 1 week ago
How is it illegal? And how much did it cost him to make it work I wonder.
HappyTimeHarry@lemm.ee 1 week ago
Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 1 week ago
It’s not money laundering, they were creating fake engagement and getting advertising revenue out of it.
Badeendje@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Could be if the revenue was paid out to non existing aliasses and then transferred to himself.
But getting paid royalties directly by Spotify would not need to be laundered as it’s legit money for the irs.
Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 1 week ago
Yeah, it’s just a good old fashioned grift by the sound of it.
HappyTimeHarry@lemm.ee 1 week ago
getting bots to fake engagement for a profit is money laundering, believe it or not. its a pretty vague crime that basically amounts to getting paid in a way thats deceptive, in this case the deception is the bots.
Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 1 week ago
Hmm. If that’s true, the legal definition and the definition we typically use are very different.
Vent@lemm.ee 1 week ago
The headline focuses on the wrong thing. Making a bunch of crappy songs and uploading the to Spotify and other streaming services is perfectly legal, AI or not.
The illegal part is that he created lots and lots of fake accounts that constantly streamed his songs and masked them to look like authentic listens. So much so that he was making $110k per month. That is straight-up fraud, which is what he was arrested for.
It has nothing to do with AI, but that makes more people click on the article.