Based on the link another user had to provide, you received a lengthy criticism of your logic and sources and then didn’t handle it well.
Now you are here calling them crazy.
Comment on Is it me or is everyone in hexbear insane?
EABOD25@lemm.ee 1 week agoThe one dude I spoke that was decent and respectful asked for proof of the Uygher genocide, gave him proof, the proof wasn’t good enough. Gave him more proof told me it still wasn’t good enough. Figured it wasn’t worth it anymore because he’s denying everything I give him. Told him he has a movable goal post and peace be with him. Blocked the community and just found out today they banned me. There probably are people that willing to have a dialog, but the few are giving all a bad rep
TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 1 week ago
EABOD25@lemm.ee 1 week ago
I think I handled very well. The one person continued to refuse my assignment, so I left before OP, and I was going to get at each other’s throats. I got nothing at all against OP because they were cool. I’m pretty sure I said that 100 times by now. It was everyone else that was the problem.
TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 1 week ago
I think I handled very well.
One user asked you to provide any source material since 2022. As an answer, you provided (seemingly) 3 links, none of which were source material for the claim since 2022.
When this was pointed out, rather than engage with these failures, you just posted 5 links.
A different user replied to you to point out that all of the sourcing in those articles goes back to a particularly absurd fraud named Adrian Zenz. I’ll add that the sourcing is also pre-2022, but the user responding to you wrote several paragraphs critical of Zenz and why you should be skeptical. You did not respond to this person at all despite replying to others later.
The user from before responded by immediately pointing out that your links, yet again, did not include sourcing since 2022. They then went through each link to explained how this was the case.
Your response to this: “I did learn something. You have a movable goal post. On that note, I’m out. Peace be with you”. That’s it. That’s all you wrote.
What I just described is you displaying a series of bad faith behaviors. And then you came over here to complain Lmao.
pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 week ago
Objection@lemmy.ml 1 week ago
Do you have a link to that conversation? I’m interested in what your proof looked like.
mathemachristian@lemm.ee 1 week ago
Here it is hexbear.net/post/3384251/5347245
Objection@lemmy.ml 1 week ago
I have a rule that anytime anyone says something happened on the fediverse without providing a link, they are lying or mischaracterizing it literally 100% of the time, and that rule has proven itself yet again.
EABOD25@lemm.ee 1 week ago
Afraid not. I’m banned from that community now, but here are the links
theguardian.com/…/china-is-committing-a-genocide-…
vox.com/…/china-uyghur-muslim-genocide-xinjiang-u…
www.globalr2p.org/countries/china/
thediplomat.com/…/erasing-memories-concealing-evi…
genocidewatch.com/…/chinese-genocide-of-uyghurs-i…
hrw.org/…/chinas-crimes-against-humanity-targetin…
…gwu.edu/…/chinas-genocide-against-uyghurs/
foreignpolicy.com/…/uyghur-genocide-nury-turkel-i…
Objection@lemmy.ml 1 week ago
I found the thread and you had several people read your links and go through them in detail. Most of what they’re claiming is traced back to crackpot Adrian Zenz.
As I said, if you go there and say wrong things and then can’t back them up, they’re going to be rude to you. Citing Adrian Zenz is one form of not being able to back up your claims.
EABOD25@lemm.ee 1 week ago