Comment on Ladies and Gentlemen, the sate of AI.

Sorse@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

• Zwiebel@feddit.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  1000031884

  source

  • kescusay@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    The best thing about this is that it’s also on the x-axis.

    source

    • frezik@midwest.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      And they validated this data 4 times. It’s really good data.

      source

      • prayer@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

        Actually, they only validated up to 4xs in the product name, so take the 5x result with a grain of salt, one of the Xs aren’t validated.

        source
  • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    “Thanks Steve.”

    source
  • stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    this would’ve been better if they asked an LLM how many x’s each of those contained

    source
• superkret@feddit.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  X is deprecated. Use the RWayland 7900 WaylandTWayland instead.

  source
• synapse1278@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  That’s 50% more Xs ! You can beat this deal !

  source

  • homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    This bad boy can fit so many X’s in it

    source

    • synapse1278@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Out of all the marketing letters (E, G, I, R, T and X) X is definitely the betterest!

      source
    • grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      How many X are in XTX?

      source
• Rubanski@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  But what about the xXx_RX_7900_xXx?

  source

  • Steak@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    xXx_RX_790042069_xXx

    source
• EngineerGaming@feddit.nl ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  But X is bad, as proved by Elon Musk - so it should be the other way around.

  source
• AtHeartEngineer@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  That X is twice as much vram, which funny enough, is great for running ai models

  source
• sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  My question is, is X better than XTX? XTX has more Xs, but X has only Xs. I think I need AI to solve this quandary.

  source