irq0

@irq0@infosec.pub

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨These are your only alternatives. ⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago⁩:

  A shoe horn is still a better spoon than option 3

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨These are your only alternatives. ⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago⁩:

  1 - I don’t want my spoons to be ribbed for her pleasure 2 - This spoon is simply incorrect 3 - This is the most disgusting thing I’ve ever seen

  I’ll choose option 4, its the least offensive option, but I’m not happy about it

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Homelab networking recommendations?⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  I used to run PFSense ( pretty much the same as Opensense ) and really liked it but moved over to Ubiquity in the last year or so. Here’s my 2 cents…

  Go with Ubiquity if you want a single unified interface for managing all your devices. You’ll have “soft vendor lock in”, their kit will work just fine with a mix of hardware but it’s best if everything is Ubiquity

  Go with Opensense if you want complete flexibility in the kit you’re using. I feel likeI had more fine grained control with PFSense than I do with Ubiquity but I think that’s a symptom of how the UI/UX rather than the features

  You can do the same stuff with both options. I’m very happy with my Ubiquity set up, I don’t see myself changing anything anytime soon