syaochan
@syaochan@feddit.it
- Comment on ntfy alternative with file attachment on iOS 1 week ago:
I have to try this, thanks.
- Comment on ntfy alternative with file attachment on iOS 1 week ago:
I’m currently using email (not self-hosted for now) but sometimes the file size exceeds 25 MB and it won’t get sent. I’m looking for a solution simpler than setting up a mail server.
- Comment on ntfy alternative with file attachment on iOS 1 week ago:
Also ntfy can be self-hosted (I’m already doing that for other reasons) and it supports file attachments. The problem is the iOS app. Unfortunately gotify does not even have iOS support.
- Comment on ntfy alternative with file attachment on iOS 1 week ago:
I looked into Syncthing for other reasons in the past, isn’t it a sort of Dropbox replacement? I’m not sure how I can achieve what I want with it.
- Comment on ntfy alternative with file attachment on iOS 2 weeks ago:
I want to send a file to an iPad from a cron script. Currently I’m attaching it to a mail, but if the file is bigger than the max attachment size it won’t be sent. Also in this way I’m using an external service when it’s not needed, since both source and destination are on my lan. I tried ntfy because I was already using it for other tasks, so the server was already in place, but then I realized that iPad app is very limited.
- Comment on ntfy alternative with file attachment on iOS 2 weeks ago:
Thanks for the idea about sending a link, I’ll try that
- Submitted 2 weeks ago to selfhosted@lemmy.world | 13 comments
- Comment on Can't block this 1 month ago:
Tongue of Theseus
- Comment on Self hosting hardware - what are your experiences with Lenovo ThinkCentre as homelab server? 2 months ago:
thanks
- Comment on Self hosting hardware - what are your experiences with Lenovo ThinkCentre as homelab server? 2 months ago:
That blue led on the Minisforum sure is bright! BTW could you share the file for the bracket of the network card? I also have an M920q with a 10GbE card (single SFP), but I still have to figure out a bracket so at the moment it’s open, just a bit of tape under the card to not short it on the ports below.
- Comment on Stupid sexy raft 3 months ago:
Direct link to Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_prison_experiment
- Comment on HP and Dell disable HEVC support built into their laptops’ CPUs 3 months ago:
Or eating habits
- Comment on [Rec] Anime with great emotional payoff 3 months ago:
School Days
Nice boat
- Comment on [Discussion] What is the best rated 18+ anime you've seen? 4 months ago:
- Comment on Physics! 4 months ago:
Mercury rectifiers are one of the coolest thing I’ve ever seen (not in person unfortunately)
- Comment on Share single service via WireGuard 5 months ago:
Why the downvote?
- Comment on Share single service via WireGuard 5 months ago:
Don’t worry, there’s no deadline here. I’m not sure I got it so I’ll try to explain what I understood. You’re saying that I have to set a single IP address for the client, and allow that single address to connect to service on port 8080 on 192.168.10.1 in the firewall, right? I’m not too confident in my ability to configure the firewall, so I thought that completely isolate the subnet 192.168.2.0 and then forward a single port to it was the safe choice.
- Comment on Share single service via WireGuard 5 months ago:
Now I have. Is this a roundabout way to say you did not appreciate my touchpad art? /j
- Comment on [deleted] 5 months ago:
s/step/sit
- Comment on Share single service via WireGuard 5 months ago:
If I understood correctly I should either get a VPS to host Pangolin or use their cloud. This would increase the costs right?
- Comment on Share single service via WireGuard 5 months ago:
Could you elaborate what you mean with setting the allowed IPs? Yes, without tls.
- Comment on Share single service via WireGuard 5 months ago:
Isn’t Pangolin just a reverse proxy?
- Comment on Share single service via WireGuard 5 months ago:
I’m not sure if I understood, but on the host there are other services I do not want to share outside my LAN. My goal was to share a single service.
- Comment on Share single service via WireGuard 5 months ago:
I know about Tailscale, but since it’s a commercial service I’m not keen to adopt it and then maybe they stop having a free tier. I’ll look into Headscale instead, I did not know that before.
- Comment on Share single service via WireGuard 5 months ago:
Thanks for the link, I did not know this service. I’m still a bit reluctant to use commercial solutions which may do a rug pull in the future.
- Comment on Share single service via WireGuard 5 months ago:
The service runs on another machine with address 192.168.1.10, so a different subnet than the WireGuard one, hence the port forward. I confirmed that this works, I can reach the service from phone on mobile data connected to WireGuard endpoint.
- Submitted 5 months ago to selfhosted@lemmy.world | 23 comments
- Comment on Count yourself lucky 7 months ago:
A bit unrelated (to the picture at least). But in general, knowing that there’s someone living in conditions worse than I am does not make me feel better at all. Am I strange?
- Comment on Say less 7 months ago:
- Comment on There’s Good Posture, Bad Posture, and Golden Posture 8 months ago:
Probably that’s a trackball, and I second your second
