ghutchis
@ghutchis@discuss.avogadro.cc
- Comment on Feedback Wanted: Manage Plugin Dialog 1 day ago:
Here’s my latest version. The author list grows if needed (e.g., here) and gives a download count and a link to the bug tracker.
Thoughts? Ideas? Right now, the keywords are stored in the model but in a hidden column. (Not that any current plugin includes keywords in their pyproject.toml yet.)
- Comment on Naming input files 1 day ago:
The nightly builds remember settings in the input generators, yes.
I’ll take a look at the default filenames later this afternoon.
- Comment on Feedback Wanted: Manage Plugin Dialog 2 weeks ago:
That would be my suggestion, since most (all?) of the current plugins don’t use
project.urls.issues:slight_smile:It’s fairly common for people to list things in the README, but that’s not very uniform and I’m a little reluctant to try to extract DOI or BibTeX from the README.
I guess the alternative would be to add something like
pyproject.urls.doias a list in thepyproject.tomlas an alternative if theCITATION.cffisn’t found. - Comment on Feedback Wanted: Manage Plugin Dialog 2 weeks ago:
Right now “recent” is defined as 180 days. I’d just change it to 30.
I’d just want to make sure we have a fallback for plugins that don’t add the
project.urls.issuesorbugs. Right now, for example, I see that “description” is missing on one of mine (mattersim)As for citations, GitHub suggests
CITATION.cfffiles, but I kind of like theduecreditpackage which handles NumPy and SciPy, as well as MDAnalysis already.My concern is that as the number of plugins grow, we’ll want more organization than a sorted list. I feel like ~30 is starting to get to that point and certainly ~50 will start to feel a bit overwhelming.
I’m also thinking about some ways to add a “plugin gallery” to the website - since some users don’t realize we already have plugins for RDKit, xtb, etc. based on the survey.
- Submitted 2 weeks ago to Avogadro Design, Interface and User Experience@discuss.avogadro.cc | 5 comments