irotsoma

I usually use my phone with WiFi off or set up my phone as a hotspot while not connected to WiFi so my laptop can connect through my cell carrier’s network. Always helps for testing external connections quickly and easily.

This would be the 3rd time since I’ve been using it that it has broken compatibility with Vaultwarden, but Vaultwarden always fixes it pretty quickly. But usually browser plugins end up updating before I get around to updating Vaultwarden.

Yeah it has both onetime and subscription. I got the one time for around $15.

And yeah the app is available in multiple places. For Android, I get it from a custom Fdroid repo but Obtanium would work as well. I use that for a few apps.

Yes they can both be used at the same time, though KeyPass stuff is new and beta. I’ve never used it.

There is both a subscription model and a one time payment model. I bought it with the one-time payment. I believe it was $15. But don’t quote me.

Keyguard. It’s not perfect and makes money from the paid version for syncing changes back to the server as well as offline editing that will then sync when you’re back online. But it was worth it back when I bought it, and it has never broken so far.

Thanks, probably saved me a lot of headache on my laptop browsers. Fortunately, I don’t use the official Bitwarden client on android partly because this seems to keep happening.

I use Signal because it’s the best balance of privacy and security vs. convenience and reliability I have found. Not self-hosted, but I’ve yet to find a self hosted alternative that is as reliable, especially since I don’t want to set up distributed servers, and it’s one of those things that “just needs to work” or people will abandon it quickly.

And the older people I’ve convinced to use it, like my mom, have had very little trouble adopting it. It helped that RCS messaging is so unreliable on my phone since Google or my carrier keep seeming to break it (likely became I use GrapheneOS), and also for those with iPhones it is way more compatible with itself vs Apple and Google refusing to implement RCS in a way that all features work between them, like message reactions. Without RCS, my mom couldn’t send me decent quality pictures of my niece all the time, and I couldn’t send nice pictures of my outfits to the girl I’m dating, LOL.

Can you use a dummy address or a friend’s address in another country and/or sign up via a VPN to mask your location? There are companies that will open and scan your mail and make it available online so it could be a real address. But they are a little pricey. It’s likely due to UK laws not the provider themselves, so probably all reputable providers (that follow the law) may require it.

If it’s closed source but can be self hosted, what is the business model? I think it would be hard to fight piracy in that case. If it requires connecting to a service periodically for licenses and has no free version that doesn’t require that, then I believe it should be banned. I don’t consider that self-hosted. That’s just running on your hardware, but not under your control. If the application is open or can be run locally without internet access and the paid portion is an add on like working as a proxy or something, then I have no real issue with that.

That said, there definitely should be a higher standard for users who are only marketing here. They should be making posts specifically for this group, not just sharing generic ads. The post should specifically state why it’s useful to self-hosters and thus relevant to the group.

I run a single instance of Postgres and one of MariaDB on my NAS that all services connect to. And all of my containers store their settings in NFS shares from that NAS and backup most other things to the NAS. This greatly simplifies off-site backups overall when a copy of almost everything critical lives on the NAS.

Of course, the NAS needs to be powerful enough to handle the load, but since settings don’t get changed often and backups are during off hours and NFS has good caching anyway, the DBs are really the only heavy load on the NAS outside of storing and serving media. It has plenty of memory and has two 2.5Gb ports trunked together and a couple of small SSDs for fast caching in addition to the RAID array of HDDs. So it’s easily able to handle all of its file sharing duties as well as hosting the DBs.

Only negative might be that there’s no fail over if the NAS goes down. But I also don’t have a second router, so that’s another even more devastating single point of failure. But since everything critical is backed up to the NAS and then off-site, it’s an acceptable risk considering the cost to properly remediate it and the unlikelihood of major issues outside of times I’m doing maintenance..

I have a lifetime pass from many years ago when it was cheap. So I’m not in a huge rush to convert and want to do it right. But I am on the path to converting. I decided to make a major change to my home server infrastructure and it’s still in an experimental stage. Moving from a really old standalone computer I’ve used for. HTPC purposes over the years, currently dedicated to Plex combined with a few raspberry pi’s of various generations for the little stuff, and a single, good NUC for my router, to adding two additional NUCs and eventually upgrading the Plex computer with a more modern processor and video card for ML stuff for Immich and a few other systems that I plan to start using. I’m not just moving from Plex, but also a lot of Google and Nest products.

My dilemma has been Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes. I was trying to set up Kubernetes in a way that is easily repeatable and self documenting, but ended up with lots of manual steps required to install things and lots of things that I had to write my own helm charts for as well as the scripts to install and set up Kubernetes itself on each of the servers. Lots of custom stuff. Docker Swarm would be way easier, but the issue is I’m worried about Docker getting so proprietary these days and swarm mode getting so little attention, and Podman quadlets aren’t self balancing across multiple small servers like swarm. So that’s why I haven’t switched to Jellyfin yet.

Plex prices are expensive just to access your own media. Tailscale can do it for free.

Tailscale isn’t exactly free. It requires a lot more knowledge, configuration, maintenance, etc, than Plex alone.

Sure, many self-hosters have the ability to figure it out and the proper networking and/or server hardware to implement it. But many Plex users aren’t really self-hosters in that sense. Hosting a local media server that deals with all of the networking stuff for you is much easier than maintaining a tailscale or similar setup on top of the media server stuff. I mean for me, if I hadn’t gotten a lifetime Plex Pass early on for cheap, I probably would have put more effort into my Jellyfin setup. But Plex mostly just works and I have other bigger priorities. I hate the functionality they’ve removed that makes things more difficult than it should be, or I wouldn’t be switching, but it’s not all that bad. So if I didn’t have the expertise and hardware already, I could see it being worth the money to stick with it.