onehundredsixtynine
@onehundredsixtynine@sh.itjust.works
- Comment on YSK: You can use uBlock Origin to filter Lemmy posts based on certain words 1 week ago:
Fucking normies…
- Comment on YSK: You can use uBlock Origin to filter Lemmy posts based on certain words 1 week ago:
There are people who don’t have an account/don’t log in every time they visit Lemmy.
Using RSS would be a better option for them than some extension’s filters, though.
- Comment on Going to a Protest? Don't Bring Your Phone Without Doing This First 1 week ago:
whatsapp signal telegram
Telegram isn’t encrypted[1, while Whatsapp and Signal are US-based, which means that they will give up your data on the first request.
Use actually secure messengers, like Delta Chat, SimpleX, or Matrix with end-to-end encryption.
- Comment on Wikipeter was the founder of the site in 1993 when he wanted to know more about model trains without having to visit the library 2 weeks ago:
Wikipedia, as well as encyclopedias and textbooks, are secondary sources.
- Comment on Wikipeter was the founder of the site in 1993 when he wanted to know more about model trains without having to visit the library 2 weeks ago:
primary> don’t take Wikipedia seriously unless it cites a primary source directly. Primary sources are against the policy in 99.9% of cases.
- Comment on Quick post about AI-free FireFox Based Browsers (Keep your Adds and avoid the Bloat) 3 weeks ago:
You can even disable these features if you do not like them at all
As a smart person said:
BETTER IT NOT EXIST AT ALL
If I went to a restaurant, they placed a hot steaming stinky turd sandwich on my table and then went “oh, but you don’t have to have it”, I still wouldn’t fucking eat there.
Why should we be okay with the Turd Sandwich that is
crypto being served by BraveLLM features served by Mozilla being opt-in??? - Submitted 4 weeks ago to youshouldknow@lemmy.world | 5 comments
- Comment on Flock Exposed Its AI-Powered Cameras to the Internet. 404 Media Tracked Themselves. 4 weeks ago:
How so? HN is literally the only forum I know of which doesn’t require email to regsiter an account and has a free, publicly accessible API.
- Comment on It just keeps getting worse - Firefox to "evolve into a modern AI browser" 5 weeks ago:
The problem is the AI being here in itself. It shouldn’t be in Firefox, or frankly any other software.
Also, corporations and their CEOs lie every day, you know.
- Comment on No AI* Here - A Response to Mozilla's Next Chapter - Waterfox Blog 5 weeks ago:
All these teams cannot maintain their own browser engine
- Comment on Mozilla’s new CEO is doubling down on an AI future for Firefox 5 weeks ago:
- Comment on It Only Takes A Handful Of Samples To Poison Any Size LLM, Anthropic Finds 5 weeks ago:
There are poisoning scripts for images
Link?
- Comment on It Only Takes A Handful Of Samples To Poison Any Size LLM, Anthropic Finds 5 weeks ago:
But seriosuly: don’t do this. Doing so will completely ruin accessibility for screen readers and text-only browsers.
- Comment on sacrificing accessibility for not getting web-scraped 5 weeks ago:
Honestly, fuck anyone who seriously implements this on their website.
- Comment on Windows Marketshare since 2010 5 weeks ago:
Here’s a table version of this graph:
Year-Month Windows, % OS X, % Unknown, % Linux, % Chrome OS, % iOS, % Android, % Playstation, % macOS, % Other, % 2010-01 93.76 5.16 0.2 0.7 0 0 0 0.15 0 0.02 2011-01 92.02 6.56 0.07 0.74 0 0.44 0.01 0.15 0 0.02 2012-01 89.62 7.33 0.07 0.82 0 1.71 0.24 0.14 0 0.07 2013-01 90.96 7.95 0.07 0.88 0.01 0 0.12 0 0 0 2014-01 88.87 8.35 0.05 1.13 0.14 0 1.45 0 0 0 2015-01 88.19 9.1 0.91 1.46 0.33 0 0 0 0 0.01 2016-01 85.18 9.03 3.8 1.47 0.51 0 0 0 0 0.01 2017-01 84.4 11.2 2.07 1.55 0.77 0 0 0 0 0.01 2018-01 82.68 12.8 2.17 1.43 0.9 0 0 0 0 0.01 2019-01 75.47 12.33 9.41 1.61 1.17 0 0 0 0 0.01 2020-01 77.7 17.04 1.83 1.9 1.52 0 0 0 0 0 2021-01 76.26 16.91 3 1.91 1.91 0 0 0 0 0.01 2022-01 75.5 15.85 3.86 2.19 2.6 0 0 0 0 0.01 2023-01 74.14 15.33 5.27 2.91 2.35 0 0 0 0 0.01 2024-01 73 16.11 5.33 3.77 1.78 0 0 0 0 0.01 2025-01 71.9 15.02 7.43 3.72 1.92 0 0 0 0 0.01 2025-11 69.37 8.26 13.14 3.07 1.3 0 0 0 4.85 0 Unfortunately I can’t paste the whole table here because of character limit so look at it here if you want to (in Markdown format).
- Comment on YSK about SearXNG - an open metasearch engine 1 month ago:
I like it because there are some very obscure sites in its index, which can be returned from fairly simple queries.
- Comment on YSK about SearXNG - an open metasearch engine 1 month ago:
The other search engines still work but I tend to get irrelevant nonsense as results
Yahoo and Duckduckgo return good results for me on the instance I use.
- Submitted 1 month ago to youshouldknow@lemmy.world | 16 comments
- Submitted 2 months ago to technology@lemmy.world | 2 comments
- Submitted 2 months ago to technology@lemmy.world | 19 comments
- YSK about Wikimedia Commons - a wiki-style media repository of freely licensed filescommons.wikimedia.org ↗Submitted 2 months ago to youshouldknow@lemmy.world | 8 comments
- Submitted 2 months ago to youshouldknow@lemmy.world | 26 comments
- Comment on The Great Software Quality Collapse: How We Normalized Catastrophe 3 months ago:
- Submitted 3 months ago to technology@lemmy.world | 155 comments
- Coordinated Pro-Russian Propaganda Network Targeting ActivityPub and ATProto Servicesabout.iftas.org ↗Submitted 3 months ago to fediverse@lemmy.world | 71 comments
- Comment on Why does Lemmy output horribly invalid HTML? 3 months ago:
Interesting fact: Firefox (or Gecko to be accurate, because there was no single “Firefox” browser back then - there was Netscape Navigator and Mozilla Application Suite) had such rendering mode, but it was quickly abandoned.^[hsivonen.fi/doctype/: “In the summer of 2000 before Netscape 6 was released, Gecko actually had parser modes that enforced HTML syntax rules and one of these modes was called the “Strict DTD”. These modes were incompatible with existing Web content and were abandoned.”]
- Submitted 3 months ago to nostupidquestions@lemmy.world | 10 comments
- Comment on YSK: there's a browser extension called "SingleFile", which allows you to save a page into a single HTML file. 3 months ago:
I can’t imagine why I would want to save the interface on a YouTube page
Archiving a community post, for example.
- YSK: there's a browser extension called "SingleFile", which allows you to save a page into a single HTML file.www.getsinglefile.com ↗Submitted 3 months ago to youshouldknow@lemmy.world | 38 comments