masquenox
@masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Atheism is the opiate of the insufferable.
That is all.
- Comment on Why do conservatives define being fascist solely as "being violent?" 5 weeks ago:
Sure thing.
- Comment on Why do conservatives define being fascist solely as "being violent?" 5 weeks ago:
Is feigning incoherence the new liberal thing?
I don’t see how this is any better than “lesser-evilism.”
- Comment on Why do conservatives define being fascist solely as "being violent?" 5 weeks ago:
Again… why so desperate?
- Comment on Why do conservatives define being fascist solely as "being violent?" 5 weeks ago:
Why do you sound so desperate?
- Comment on Why do conservatives define being fascist solely as "being violent?" 1 month ago:
So that’s the game plan, then?
- Comment on Why do conservatives define being fascist solely as "being violent?" 1 month ago:
I’m not the one speedrunning canned replies, Clyde. You are.
- Comment on Why do conservatives define being fascist solely as "being violent?" 1 month ago:
You don’t like being called a liberal?
- Comment on Why do conservatives define being fascist solely as "being violent?" 1 month ago:
Soooo, again… you’re just another liberal that doesn’t want to accept how right-wing your ideology truly is.
- Comment on Why do conservatives define being fascist solely as "being violent?" 1 month ago:
What’s the matter? Afraid your pretend-leftist schtick isn’t working the way you thought it would?
What’s the game plan, liberal? Praying all the Palestinians are dead before 2028?
- Comment on Why do conservatives define being fascist solely as "being violent?" 1 month ago:
Again… your incoherence is a “me” problem?
- Comment on Why do conservatives define being fascist solely as "being violent?" 1 month ago:
Your incoherence is a “me” problem?
- Comment on Why do conservatives define being fascist solely as "being violent?" 1 month ago:
Nothing but incoherence from you again… wanna take a breather from all that “reaching across the aisle” you’ve been doing and try again, liberal?
- Comment on Why do conservatives define being fascist solely as "being violent?" 1 month ago:
Oh, look - a liberal telling leftists what they should or shouldn’t do.
Do tell, liberal… why should leftists listen to anything a right-winger says?
- Comment on Why do conservatives define being fascist solely as "being violent?" 1 month ago:
Ie… you’re a liberal.
- Comment on Why do conservatives define being fascist solely as "being violent?" 1 month ago:
Falling for right-wing narratives without too much resistance is your characteristic, liberal… not us leftists.
- Comment on Why do conservatives define being fascist solely as "being violent?" 1 month ago:
Which part of…
Ie… no workable definition of fascism.
…didn’t you get the first time around, Clyde?
- Comment on Why do conservatives define being fascist solely as "being violent?" 1 month ago:
What else should I call a liberal… except a liberal?
- Comment on Why do conservatives define being fascist solely as "being violent?" 1 month ago:
And now you’ve become just completely incoherent… no wonder alt-righters that desperately avoid debates with real leftists have no problem running circles around you - your own logic defeats you before you’ve even started.
- Comment on Why do conservatives define being fascist solely as "being violent?" 1 month ago:
Ie… liberal.
- Comment on Why do conservatives define being fascist solely as "being violent?" 1 month ago:
Right, right… the (so-called) “free market” would never allow capitalists to act in a concerted way to dominate it, could they? Because… erm… reasons… something, something, “invisible hand,” something, something.
Tell me another one, liberal.
- Comment on Why do conservatives define being fascist solely as "being violent?" 1 month ago:
Partisans were people who fought actual Nazis, Clyde… you know, that thing you liberals couldn’t be bothered to do?
- Comment on Why do conservatives define being fascist solely as "being violent?" 1 month ago:
intruding in spaces where you are clearly not wanted
Oooooh, I don’t know about that… it seems it’s only desperate liberals that don’t want real leftists around.
Besides… you don’t need me to highlight the intimate links between liberalism and fascism for everybody - you and Genocide Joe managed that quite nicely.
- Comment on Why do conservatives define being fascist solely as "being violent?" 1 month ago:
Soooo… you’re just another liberal that doesn’t want to accept how right-wing your ideology truly is.
- Comment on Why do conservatives define being fascist solely as "being violent?" 1 month ago:
Umberto Eco never managed to “define” fascism, Clyde.
He only provided a list of characteristics of (what he termed) “ur-fascism” - what I’d call “secondary fascism” (ie, the violent re-enforcement of the status quo in the imperial core using methods and justifications pioneered in the colonised world).
Here is what he said himself -
“These features cannot be organized into a system; many of them contradict each other, and are also typical of other kinds of despotism or fanaticism.”
Ie… no workable definition of fascism.
Okay?
- Comment on Why do conservatives define being fascist solely as "being violent?" 1 month ago:
“Crony capitalism” is the only kind of capitalism there is and always have been, genius.
- Comment on Why do conservatives define being fascist solely as "being violent?" 1 month ago:
I’ve already answered that question for you… your reaction suggests you’re a liberal that didn’t like what they were told.
- Comment on Why do conservatives define being fascist solely as "being violent?" 1 month ago:
You seem very desperate to pretend that there really is a big difference between liberalism and (so-called) “conservatism.”
Are you a liberal, perhaps?
- Comment on Why do conservatives define being fascist solely as "being violent?" 1 month ago:
laizzez-faire isn’t an exclusive tenant of liberalism
Ooooooh… do tell, genius - what other ideology is so blindingly loyal to the capitalist mode of production?
Monarchism, perhaps?
Is there a particular reason you don’t want to admit what liberalism is and always have been?
- Comment on Why do conservatives define being fascist solely as "being violent?" 1 month ago:
There has been a shinning example of Fascism in the US since it’s creation.
Yes. Mussolini didn’t invent it… he just gave it a convenient name for us to use. What we call “fascism” today was birthed by colonialist brutality long before it’s vicious logic was applied to the populations of the newly-minted imperial core.
This is why all the (so-called) “definitions” of fascism offered by liberals is so risible - they conveniently forget about fascism’s intimate links with imperialism (and therefore liberalism - the preferred ideology of colonisers) and merely try to write it off as some “aberration” of otherwise “perfect” western civilisation.
- Comment on Why do conservatives define being fascist solely as "being violent?" 1 month ago:
Lol!
Did you actually read what you posted, genius?
Here. I’ll make this a bit less confusing for you.
“An economic theory in favour of laizzez-faire, the free market, and the gold standard.”
Do tell… which of the two formal political factions in the US is most in favour of allowing billionaire parasites (ie, capitalists) to run everything and using the (so-called) “free market” a justification for that?
The people (honestly) calling themselves “liberals” or the people (falsely) calling themselves “conservatives?”
Read this part real careful like… political conservatism is a dead ideology.
You don’t have to believe me - hear it from an actual conservative.